If they integrate aml check before the creation of the deal so the receiver would know what kind of aml score they are going to get after this trade, as a matter of fact many p2p platforms don't have this and I won't say anything about Bridgoro if they don't prefer it but they do that's really great.

Recently I had a issue with my account that got suspecious money and it got blocked but after giving the proper reasons it unlocked but it was due to receiving money in p2p from a big centralized exchange I know they don't care about this like what kind of aml score I am getting from another party using their serives but they do care about wallets haha.

So, that's not only me who has faced this kind of issue. I also have experienced this drama, and as far as I remember, this happened with me this year in the month of March. Where exchange left me a message that you have to give all the proofs of your transaction, and in case I do not provide them with the information, they said they will restrict your account. That surprised me badly, like TBH the transaction was fair, but I don't know why they asked me for it.

Maybe exchange intentionally needed more personal information about me at that time, which I really hate a lot, and this feels me like more and more KYC platforms. Well, i have to provide all the information that they asked me to close that case and littery this shit repeat itself two times i mean the same case was opened two times with me.

The test period was extended because at some point, they took a break in order to resolve all the deficiencies identified up to that point. Beta testing was officially completed yesterday, and rewards were paid out today.
Given that the team currently has a lot of things to fix bugs, replacing this banner is probably not their priority. Finally, the project is still in the beta phase, and the official start is only expected in January.

Is there a concept of "clean" and "dirty" cryptocurrency here, or does the exchange happen in any case?

If the "platform does not interfere with the nature of user transactions", according to the terms, then the user should conduct AML check on their own if they want to send coins to the exchange?

It seems that you are comparing Bridgoro, as a P2P exchange, with traditional exchanges in general.

The KYC process is generally related to AML requirements. Since Bridgoro applies a KYC-free principle, there are no AML check procedures in place either. Bridgoro’s role is to act as an automated escrow to ensure that transactions remain secure and anonymous. It does not interfere with the source of funds used by users in their transactions, nor does it provide features that allow users to check each other’s KYC/AML status. You can find a more detailed explanation of Bridgoro’s KYC/AML policy in their Whitepaper and Terms & Conditions.

Translation into Russian is available at this link: https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/5568363

That's really become a problem when they do it, especially with p2p I don't know about your current status bro, but next time just avoid that person and report him/her as well.

As you might known already that now our country has legally accepted the exchanges and I am sure the one you faced problem is in it right haha don't tell me I think I guessed it right haha.

Anyway, AML check is a big plus.

I didn't have enough free time to join last round of Bridgoro exchange beta testing, but good work to everyone who contributed and found bugs.
It's good to see that LoyceV won the first place and received reward in confidential way
I am waiting to see how fiat integration will work in 2026.

Thank you for adding the ANN Bridgoro Exchange link (Indonesian version) to the original ANN Bridgoro.com - Instant Crypto Exchange source thread.

By the way, I noticed that the link in the Telegram community channel redirects to TryNinja’s Bitcointalk Notification BOT [Telegram] thread, so I’ve replaced it with the Bridgoro Telegram channel link (https://t.me/bridgoro_exchange) in the translated thread.