Your intention is good, but how you construct your title makes it appear misleading. The title alone suggests this is a topic created by the forum's top campaign manager or by someone who is an authority on post quality. It could have been better if the title had been "Suggestion on how to make a good signature campaign," making it an invitation for a community effort.

We already have this
But I'm sure other campaign managers also have a grading system, or they mark participants based on their performance. Every campaign managers have their own rules and system.

OP wants to improve the signature campaigns and the quality of the forum, but has never given even one suggestion on how to do so; everything on this topic is already covered.

OP should first come up with a unique idea for improving the quality of the forum and signature campaigns that were not mentioned or overlooked by everyone here.

I don't know how active you were when you joined the forum in 2017. But if you could still remember those days, you'd likely say we're a lot better now. Of course, it doesn't mean we ran out of room to grow. We could still improve. And we're improving, I believe.

Those rules you're listing were steps taken by managers to improve the quality of discussions. And it's improving. They're effective. Not to mention that the forum itself has also taken steps to make things better. But you can't expect that great rules would only result into great outcomes. Say, for instance, merit. That's generally a good addition, but look at how users are spamming everywhere for its sake.


Having successful trades in the past or having paid a loan doesn't make you a good poster.