All of us who frequently use the forum have noticed that the quality of posts has been declining over the years:
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/5567395.0https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/5570810.0There are things beyond our control: bots, AI, the massification of cryptos (more people and more platforms to talk about them)...
But let discuss about things that are under our control, for example, that
big portions of posts are made by users participating in signature campaigns (+50% in some threads).
We should ask:
Do certain rules within these campaigns incentivize and reward low-quality posts?. If "YES", then I would like to discuss those rules.
Which ones lead to spam, off-topic content, repetitive meaningless messages? And what should companies (and campaign managers) do to improve these rules and posts? Tighter limits in the amount of paid posts per week? Accepting only positive trust members? etc.
Be civil, it is not a "blame specific user" or "blame specific campaign" kind of topic, the idea is to be contructive and discuss ideas for every campaign, current and future.
To help kickstart the brainstorming, Ill list a few common, general campaign rules to talk about:
01 Minimum number of posts per day or week
02 Maximum number of posts paid for per day or week
03 Posts allowed only in specific forums
04 Mandatory posts during X days of the week
05 Required minimum and/or maximum character count per post
06 Allowed languages
07 Use of AI in posts
08 Human-quality checks (internal campaign scoring system for members, approval processes for posts, etc.)
09 Bonuses
10 Use of avatar, signature, company message text
11 Rank/Merit/Trust level of recruited users
12 Campaigns with a "complaint book" to report members
