I can't agree more. Actually, traditional people typically look at the return in nominal terms, they don't consider the purchasing power, and that's bad optics.
People enjoy self-deception, which most often stems from a lack of information. You are right that bank depositors, typically from the older generation, who grew up within the traditional financial system, see only the "attractive" interest rates on deposits but fail to see real inflation and the purchasing power of money.
The new generation is smarter, but I have seen people choosing a chocolate bar when given an option to choose between a 10-ounce bar of pure silver bullion and a Hershey's King Size chocolate bar.
And what would you choose if you were starving to death? A chocolate bar or a piece of metal you couldn't chew? It all depends on your needs. At the moment.
In this situation, I only believe in one thing, that not all five fingers are equal, so not everyone is as smart as they look. Anyway, with time, I hope everyone will look at purchasing power instead of just looking from the nominal side.
The smart ones are those who manage to convince these people to hand over their money for low-interest deposits.
Not everyone notices the impact on purchasing power, as most people dislike "crunching the numbers" and live paycheck to paycheck. Yet, one would think that every trip to the store ought to "open one's eyes to reality", given that with each visit, you can buy fewer and fewer goods.
BTW, the interest rate is lower in your country, here people can earn 7% to 15% per year by depositing in banks.
Because inflation varies from country to country. It is lower in developed countries and higher in developing ones. Because of this, the interest rates charged by banks in different countries vary.
Which is a good offer because inflation is high, but not this high. But here, people have to pay 20% tax on the amount they made in profit as well.
Don't forget about "hidden" taxes, too; because of it, the total tax usually amounts to 5060% of income.
The OP way be getting 11.5% interest but the government is taking a percentage of that through
inflation, so its not really 11.5% and then there is probably a tax on that profit also.
For example in my country the government are providing a savings scheme over 10 years at 22%!
yes 22% . . . over the 10 years which is only 2.2% per year but inflation is advertised at running at
about 4%, in reality its higher. So anyone putting money in the bank is actually losing.
Same with the OP's scenario, its not actually 11.5,%
Thats where BTC makes better sense
This gave me an idea: what if, during a bear market, kept my money in a bank deposit earning interest, then closer to the start of a bull run, invested in bitcoin, waited for it to hit an ATH, sold for a profit, and put the money back into a bank deposit to earn interest during the next bear trend? In other words, trying to profit from both "systems"?