Yep, Bitcoin isn't a company, an organization or a job, so saying it was created to reduce unemployment is a bit...out there.

Bitcoin is simply a decentralized monetary system, and can be a high-return investment. To get hold of it, you still need money or you gotta work for it.

My guess is he probably never read the whitepaper and doesn't actually get Bitcoin. Or maybe he's confusing Bitcoin with jobs on the forum that pay in BTC. Some gigs paying in BTC doesn't mean Bitcoin was created to solve unemployment.

Technically not because even though developers continue to update the blockchain to continue to innovate but in the end they cannot control bitcoin because they are not enabled for that so even if there are bitcoin developers it does not mean they can control bitcoin because here bitcoin is still a stand-alone bitcoin without any control of any party.

If you look at the current conditions, developers are only said to be proposal makers but that does not mean they can decide so that the assumption about bitcoin that isn't decentralized just because there are developers in it is a mistake.

Since the beginning we already know that bitcoin is different from fiat because of its nature so when saying now bitcoin isn't decentralized it is the same as saying their system is the same as the existing one even though satoshi made this to be a differentiator.

Perhaps what this mean like most people said or are trying to point you towards is that;
This developers can come up with a change effect idea for bitcoin but have no sole control over it by enforcing it, they have to propose it and the general public which me and you and the rest of the bitcoin supporters will have to approve and that makes the developer not to have control but the control belongs to everyone. It’s not individually decided but individual decision can be proposed and given attention and approval.

Well that's a nice logic though but I would like to give you an example. So in a simple way let me use an architect for example. These are folks who draw the blueprint of a house, design how it will look like they and so on. Most times they are even the ones that will determine the interiors/layout of the building. But then do they own the house the answer is certainly no except they are building it for themselves.so you see that's just how Bitcoin is. We might have active developers, but yet they aren't the owners of Bitcoin, which means they can't in any way change the protocol as they please, because the people, are the ones who make use of it and we often have the right to determine if something is convenient or not. That's what the consensus is there for. To put it simply developers propose the rules, but then folks who are running the nodes, have the right to decide whether to accept them or not that's all.......