Because Bitcoin was originally designed for peer-to-peer transactions I think that as more people use Bitcoin for payments demand will grow and Bitcoins value will rise and eventually people will see Bitcoin as a store of value.
That is already in place, Bitcoin has already make wave and everybody already knows that Bitcoin does not only end in peer to peer but also an asset. It's only a person that lacks information that will not know what Bitcoin is an asset and also money.
Now it seems that we are focusing more on Bitcoin as a store of value than on Bitcoin as a payment method. I feel that governments have ruined Bitcoins transaction side with their regulations.
Well that was the initial plan, for it to be used for peer to peer but now as demand keep rising and adoption keep increasing, it is no longer only for peer to peer but an asset. And I don't buy the idea of saying that government has ruined Bitcoin because people with the highest Bitcoin adoption are not only the government. Some individual and group of people are involved in holding a huge amount of Bitcoin. So Bitcoin is decentralized and not centralized. If it was government that is in control of Bitcoin it means that Bitcoin is no longer decentralized but centralized.
Do you think Satoshi would be happy with Bitcoin today or would Satoshi be disappointed that Bitcoins original purpose as peer-, to-peer electronic cash is no longer the focus?
Even if Satoshi was here, he would have done nothing because even him can not stop people from using Bitcoin as an asset instead of peer to peer. Satoshi knew a day like this will come, but maybe he didn't feel it would be anytime soon.