I'm waiting to make up my mind on anon feature..... but don't listen to some of the jerks in this thread!!! I know for a fact they are part of a stupid pump group!! They're only upset you might beat them by playing an honest game!!! WHAT THE COMMUNITY DECIDES WON'T BE A SCAM THAT'S HOW THIS WORKS!!!!

I love this coin because the community owns it and that protects us from the scammers who make fake coins to walk away from!!!

I appreciate your enthusiasm but please try to keep the conversation civil. I saw some of your posts earlier and I don't think it's healthy for us to appear unwelcoming from people who participate in other coin communities. Crypto is all one big industry and family and we need to be open to all ideas. Some of us may disagree in where whitecoin goes in the future, but I hope we can continue to set a high standard for how we exchange ideas. If you see someone behaving in a way you don't approve of, either directly call them on it and move on, or ignore them.

Thanks again for your interest and support, hope you don't take this as me trying to chastise you.

So it'd be a fair assumption that the general direction for WC for the future is to have multiple coins?

Hence the desire to be a base trade currency so WC is the fundamental currency and be able to be traded directly WC - WOC and then WC - WXX coin that could be developed in the future?

If that's the concept to create new companion coins when and where they're needed to offer different services to different groups then i think WOC is a good idea, it's 'of the current moment' and would provide a good base starting point on further releases.

That's my general line of thought, I think that companion coins of some kind one day are inevitable, and really when you think about it, merely a matter of branding and packaging as to how you get them to work. I'm not saying we need to rush into it, nor do I think we should ever create a companion coin without a clear reason behind it. But yeah, having a multi-faceted service I think will be in our best interest in the long haul.

yeah certainly, it's a long term concept for what the foundation is doing and what cryptos are doing.

fundamentally i never saw the point of an anon feature but i liked that it's working towards something and i support the idea now because if the long term concept is to have a multi-faceted service then starting out at this point is probably a good move to gauge how the crypto world responds to it and hopefully learn some things which could be implemented on grander projects of the future

Well, I've never seen you on IRC. I never said how many people, I just said that from my own observations so far the majority support some move of this form, and I don't feel it's my place to declare their votes by proxy. They may well change their mind, you've certainly made me think. It's only your approach that I take issue with, with all due respect you seem to have an attitude probelm. I have no idea why you'd be saying I'm being dishonest here, we've extended community discussion because of the concerns you and a few others have raised. I think you may need to take some more time to familiarize yourself with how this community functions.

Until we have our first general assembly, we're operating by the loose consensus codes of the internet. If you scroll back, you can see birddog, cryptoseo, and many other promiment members of this community supporting some kind of a move towards privacy features. I posted the original plan day of because it seemed we had a critical mass of people on the ops side ready to take this step, which is why we brought this forward for community discusison. You can see from the reaction at first, as well as on the markets, that people were happy we went with this move.

If working together as a group to improve these ideas and take the best possible course of action is not up your alley, then I would humbly suggest that you are right, you've come to the wrong coin. I believe the real long term strength of crypto is decentralization of power, and community based decision making. You seem to be under the impression that I am married to this idea, when all I'm trying to do here is help facilitate discussion and community desires.

Best,

Chris

If you want to see where the community support for the idea is go back to page 559 from about 2 weeks ago, theres about 2 pages of people wanting anon

Perhaps I did not make my self clear. I stated I was oppose to a new coin, nothing to do with rejecting privacy in any statement I have ever made. Please show me where more than four or five people (out of hundreds) are supporting a new coin to dilute the current WC. If this is the only way to get ANON, then yes you could infer the position. Some call it attitude, I call it questioning the structure and organisation. There is nothing I can do at this point. It sounds like the wheels are in motion to create this new coin and it will ultimately wipe out the original WC for better or for worse. I am merely selecting to hedge my position before this eventuality removes value completely. Having said that, I think be shady with anon doesn't fair well with the image you are trying to sell, so you kind of contradict yourselves in that regard. White is suppose to be pure.

Good luck in your efforts as well.

thanks mate, describes all that we are going through in couple of months 
hope we continue struggle 

cheers
B.