<return value from above> would be a JSON formatted array of addresses.

Here is sample output of getaddressesbyaccount:

Yes, but I said to use "getaccountaddress" not "getaddressesbyaccount".

WeSellPND.com is Now Live and Operational!



We have partnered up with the operators of WeSellDoges, WeSellRedd, WeSellDark and WeSellCrypto, to bring our community the now live service, WeSellPND.com! You can now buy Pandacoin easily with Paypal quickly, easily and securely! They are famed for their stable and reasonable margins, and delivery in under 10 seconds! For the next 30 days, you can win 150,000 PNDs daily or 1,000,000 PNDs weekly from placing orders from them!

For more details on the promotional campaign where a pool of 8.2 Million PNDs could be won, visit - http://pandacoinpnd.org/official-partnership-with-wesellpnd-com/


Patch 3.0.1 Patch Released - Mandatory Upgrade from PandaBank v3.0.0 to v3.0.1 Patch Notes

- Fixed an issue for hybrid mode – that was causing invalid stakes for some users. *The nature of this patch is mandatory if you are currently running v3.0.0, to prevent this issue from occurring again*
– Made toolbar menu icons visible on OSX systems.
– Fixed an issue that was leading to small font sizes on some OSX systems.
– Initial translation of UI into zh_CN (Simplified Chinese).
– New command line option -qm that can be used to give an absolute path to a .qm localistation file (generator by qt-linguist) – this is useful for UI translators who want to test their translations.
- Speed improvement for ‘verify’ phase of hybrid syncing.
– Improve some text/messages within UI and ensure text/messages that could not be localist can now be localised, to allow for full localisation by translators.
– Allow translators to select the UI fonts they want used as each language should ideally have its own fonts rather than blindly using the same fonts.
– Fixed a UI issue with transaction grid ‘summary header’ whereby some of the balances would, in some instances, no longer be visible if shrinking a maximized window.
– Replace pandachain.net with pnd.showed.us as blockchain explorer.
– Fixed an issue in ‘transfer pane’ where holding down the mouse over ‘add another button’ would incorrectly perform the action multiple times.
– Fixed some usability issues in transfer pane UI, inform user if trying to make a payment with no from address selected, better error message if balance is short due to staking and other minor changes.

http://pandacoinpnd.org/mandatory-upgrade-from-pandabank-v3-0-0-to-v3-0-1-patch-notes/

No you will get multiple new accounts in your wallet (each with its own address).
Anyway it seems you have your terminology confused and what you actually want to do is send from all accounts at once using sendmany, 3.0.0 can't currently do this (though it can send from all addresses that are associated to a single account) so you will need to use version 2 in this case, hopefully the devs will add an option for this in the next release.

Anyway I don't want to spam the forums more with this - if you want to discuss more please come onto IRC to chat, however for now version 2 is probably going to be easier for you.

Yes this appears to return a single address, which may or may not actually have any unspent outputs?

So you can "sendfrom" an address which does not actually have a balance; and is actually just used as a reference to lookup the account?  This seems very bizarre.

For example my account address has never received a transaction:
http://pnd.showed.us/address/PBPhbW5VEbzrNkhDzHUNPTrB4L1VAWrdZr

Yet this is used as my "send from address"?

check out the very first post

Some responses re @manelecrypto:

1.) See this thread https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/846866.0.  There's something authentic about it with the pictures of the books, etc.  Of course the usual Bitcointalk screamers show-up nervous "lowly" Panda stole a march on them.  And there are a few opportunists trying to use the thread to pump Panda.  I'm not innocent of the latter and have a few posts of that nature.  Bitcointalk is a BS fest especially in the root altcoin directory.  Why shouldn't Panda have a few pro-Panda types in there along with the Monero cultists?

2.) We can't completely dismiss the idea that it might really be her. As guys (which I assume 99% of us are on here) we naturally assume that girls, especially cutesy acting ones, aren't that smart and are especially not that smart concerning geeky stuff like altcoins.   We all know intellectually that that is crap.  I did some Google translate work on this "Denisa" and found out she graduated from Law School.  Singing gives her more money, the chance to travel and the chance to not be stuck in a cubicle. There is definitely more here than meets the eye.  And why not have a happy spokesperson: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTWKgt-da3g?
 
3.) To Americans she doesn't seem A-list.  Well, I've looked at way too many Romanian music videos: the "look" the public their wants in their entertainers is a kind of early 1970s low end Vegas act kind of thing with big hair, heels too high, guys with pompadours, etc.  It is a different market.  That said, Denisa is all over their TV.  She is the equivalent of a "safe" white girl who sings rap, I think.  Her music style, called "Manele" is gypsy music and Romanians love gypsy music but hate actual gypsies. Some of her music is trying to escape the 80s: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NndF2reheFg.  Some is just really different but brain catching: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVQ_ONPF8cw.  With a little Hollywoodification she could do well in the States.
4.) If the whole thing is some kind of pump attempt it has failed spectacularly.  We're down to 5 sats.  I know the Panda philosophy is not care about "the price" but at some point the devs have to take action.  Trying to hire on a top level celebrity as spokesperson in a poor but Bitcoin loving country seems a good idea.  I was on her Facebook page and saw Denisa was really happy to have gotten a Volkswagon () and an iPhone 6 as gifts.  We wouldn't have to offer Madonna money to get her people's attention.

5.) As I said, if was official with a budget and a mandate in some kind of paper signed agreement I'd work on reaching out to her.  It would have to be something formal.  In that part of the world the casual way altcoin business and agreements are handled won't work.

Sounds like you are pushing too hard, in my humble opinion. We may not need any of this. When we are available at 100,000 retailers and merchants, I scarcely think it will matter. And, you know "The TEAM" already has beaucoup promotional plans in place like they always do.

I gotta agree with you on this, LMP. I originally thought it was a wonderful idea, but then it kinda' all went south. Like we were being set up for the kill, or some weirdness like that.