No I think block awards should still only go to miners with hashing power but perhaps there can be confirmation checks built in somehow.  Maybe that isn't POS but something else.

I think we should make a positive contribution to the bitcoin to diminish the negative. I think it is very difficult but not impossible

Pos is a great idea. It's rewarding for every full button to stay right? You do not need 51% hash strength, maybe 51% of full nodes

If you want to create a new protocol you should learn the basics, otherwise nobody will take you seriously. and besides there several major issues with PoS. if you solve those, just start an altcoin and get rich. end of story.

Bitcoin 10% mining were proof of stake is a Good idea for the crypto world. It is a concept to mine or validates the transactions of the block, according to how many coins a person holds. It means the more the cryptocurrency owned by miner the more mining power he/ she has. In the proof of stake system, there is no block reward, so the miners take transaction fees. Proof of stake currencies can be several thousand times more costs effective as compared to the Proof of work currencies. Peercoin was the first ever cryptocurrency to adopt this method Proof of Stake and then Next, Blockchain, Shadowcoin soon followed Peercoin for Proof of Stake.In the Proof of Work (POW) system, mining requires a huge amount of computation power to run diverse cryptographic, this power then translates to high amount of electricity and power needed for proof of work and in 2015, one bitcoin transaction required the amount of electricity needed to power up 1.57 American households per day. To kick out that electricity bill, miners sell their awarded coins for fiat money. This thing downs the price of cryptocurrency. This is why Proof of stake was created to solve issues. These days there are hundreds of cryptocurrencies using Proof of stake system. Here are some of the top ten cryptocurrencies.

I have simply exaggerated nice things from digital kinds of cash (they have improved my life), in any case, I'm baffled at the people WHO square measure certain money, and simply money. They hurt themselves and to boot digital kinds of cash future. I tragic that regardless I am unable to utilize bitcoin to shop for the items I would like because it is not utilized as associate installment cash/strategy.

I'm pitiful that there square measure vast cash connected institutions that require (and place forth a fearless effort) to wipe the crypto world out, and as against cooperating as a crypto-network to flourish, we have a tendency to square measure battling, contending, and dishonorable each other. wherever I live, the administration determinedly fixes and devastates our money-related lives. I used to be lucky to own discovered salvation in cryptanalytic kinds of cash once others battled.

Bitcoin never made a big change to be made to it due to the risk of something bad happening. I think the block prizes should still only go to miners with hash strength but perhaps can be verified validated built somehow. It's a focused databank that individuals have to trust so it works. It's a sux model, it should not inspire confidence in any one that is paying attention or not being blinded by their own interests. I think it is very difficult but not impossible.