5. Darknote - possibly tied to the original Bytecoin fraud, but not proven. Totally opaque process and little traction. Also the launch with an absurd
"Darknote - possibly tied to the original Bytecoin fraud, but not proven".
1. I claiming again and again and again - XDN, also known as duckNote, also known as DarkNote tied to original bytecoin ONLY by using their source code.
2. You have no proofs, but you say like that, thats a FUD.
The way said it was exactly the opposite of FUD. I was very explicit:
but not proven
3. I have proofs.
Interesting to hear, but unfortunately you didn't provide any. If you have something that constitutes
proof of your organizational independence from Bytecoin, please let us know because I'm quite interested. Also, I would welcome
proof that the original silly branding (or however you want to call it), followed by a fast mine, followed by a rebrand wasn't deliberately orchestrated to massively concentrate ownership, or that it didn't have that effect,
Seriously, I'm interested in this. As you know I'm impressed with a lot of the stuff I've seen from ducknote/darknote.
Finally, regarding what you call the game, I'm not sure we see that 'game' in exactly the same way, but in any case I don't hate the player. I'm not sure what game you are playing though.