So, you are comparing NEM to NEO_2014_or_2015?   (NEO or such, where was the white metal jacket Galactica soldier "Playin' 'round".
What fake is in the project, which has completed a new, working blockchain. Nothing fake.

Please, tell us your doctor's phone and name. Only then we can understand your current attitude.

It doesn`t need to be a big problem if it is located in forehead 

Warned?  About what?

And you are just wishing luck - you are so bad man!   Shouldn't you be a better man and give some more concrete ways to avoid the disaster, which you are painting to the NEM's wall.

Edit: waited 4 days....
It seems that you cannot give, coz the disaster is only in your mind

"NEM brand was damaged by negative press after the Coincheck hack in 2018"

Was that really so?    ... NEM's brand was damaged?  though the hack's reason was not in NEM system (if I remember it correctly).



Edit:

what will be the brand of a new system, whose name has meant a weapon during thousands of years?
How such will be branded to crypto future?

Why wouldn't Catapult be just the project name, but the crypto system would have another name?
If NEM's name really is damaged, then a new name should be created.

yea, maybe so...


I read the survey's last questions only after writing the post above:)  : There is a question about "a specific alternative name for Catapult".

NEM is steadily sliding out of the top 30 in CMC.

when release Catapult? why some projects said they would use Catapult?

sooooo, now it is closed !   ... missed it, while thinking the names :-(

That is the problem : clarity is still missing from NEM team.
E.g. Always in the beginning of the survey must be told, how long the survey is open, and how long the survey will approximately take.

About the name:
Catapult means weapon. According to the survey's answers it seems that many do not understand it.
Is a weapon name suitable in the world, where is many quite liberal movements (tho many are not-fact-based, but they guide the masses).


For the name must be arranged another survey, with rewards.

https://forum.nem.io/t/nem-foundation-technology-department-update-november-2019/23851

Summary is below, but more detailed information and external links are on the Official NEM forum link above.

October Tech Update

Contributions Period: October 2019

Summary

• Core devs released a new version of Catapult, codenamed Fushicho 2. The update comes with an optimization of binary transaction layouts to maximize alignment of fields, an added transactionHash for aggregate transactions with merkle hash of embedded transactions and a few bugfixes as reported on Github.

• NEM Foundation is maintaining multiple test networks for Catapult. We have executed a network reset and are planning on more tests during this month, notably some with public test networks. Stay tuned!

• The NEM Developer Center is constantly being updated to integrate latest Catapult features. Find out what has been worked on by our Technical Writers.

• A new version of the Command Line Interface for Catapult is now available (nem2-cliv0.13.4 3) with an update of the SDK and added persistent delegation request command.

• The Block/Network Explorer (Super Explorer Framework) project has seen many contributions over the course of October and is now running on pair with the NEM Foundation Testnet for Catapult.

• The Desktop Wallet project has also seen many contributions and the team is currently working on latest protocol compatibility to match our upcoming Testnet upgrade.

• The Mobile Wallet project is moving along with new features such as a dashboard for pending transactions.

https://forum.nem.io/t/nem-foundation-technology-department-update-november-2019/23851