Nevertheless, we will try to catch the thread of the constructive.

The problem is not in @Hatchet herself, but she has concentrated negative attention at himself. The problem is the lack of common project management and the absence of contact with the outside world. The project is cooked in a narrow circle of specialists, without releasing any regular information. This is a black hole with powerful energy, but not a single ray of light seeps out. A rare byte of information will go out.

@Hatchet is a special case of the problem of communications of the developers team with the outside world. Perhaps she is a good programmer, but she obviously does not know how to engage in project management and does not want to; "Back into my hole to keep building." If she is a good specialist, and she can even be a good technical manager, then let her continue his productive participation. But as a common manager she is zero, and she does not know how to talk with people (I saw this on twitter). Here you have to be a bit politician. The manager's place is vacant. There should be a project manager or better several people with competence. Who should solve this issue? I think Jaguar and Gimre can solve the issue. Who except them? Information is absent.

There must be a balance between technical and general management work. It may seem that the developer team neglects the community of users (in the broad sense, holders, including), but they are more than 100% busy with their own deals, this is a hard and giant work, and they have no time to be managers. They must delegate this part of the work to someone. If @Hatchet is fully engaged in development, then she can no longer have the functions of the manager. Do one thing but do it good. The project should have a manager. There are funds to pay for his work and this must be done. As a first step it is necessary to resume communication with the outside world.
- Inform the general public about current work, roadmap, goals
- To resume at least one available forum for the wide community without censorship and with minimal moderation (in the beginning there was an excellent forum, it is now obvious that it was the best; but then it was closed and another forum appeared, worse and clumsy, which was also closed for some reason), twitter discord telegram are unsuitable for this purpose. There should be one specific place of concentration of systematic information, where anyone freely, without artificial obstacles, could ask a question, get an answer, find information. Now scarce and limited information is scattered by bread crumbs throughout the Internet on little -known or inaccessible resources.
- I would like to at least occasionally see the presence of core developers on Bitcointalk (they have accounts).

Upbit said the same, although it was possible to do this in a different form. As a result, a great and flawlessly working NEM project received a vile blow in the form of delisting. However, upbit give a shit on everyone, they have their own hole. As it usually happens, for the safety of the population, there was a confiscation of population funds. The developers also suffered, having good steaks in reserve.

All of the above applies the same way to NEM and Symbol.

There is this interesting sentence from @Hatchet (discord):

"
 All entities we are working are being built to diverse business lines outside of NEM and SYMBOL to ensure they have a life beyond either protocol and bring value to the broader cryptocurrency space.

 Diversification is business 101, after all
"

It is right to have a broad base.
First of all, they should have a value for NEM/SYMBOL.
But this also shows that this person doesn't give a damn about NEM/SYMBOL.
-----------------------
"
 There are no public addresses. Funds for NEM Group and all prior entities are held in exchanges. The owner of  these funds is either NEM Foundation, NEM   Trust or NEM Ventures or NEM Group. The answer is
 "it depends"
 Funds may have originated from XEM, but may have appreciated or depreciated since they were originally converted.
 
 No, the shareholders will not share rates nor transaction records publicly. Holders of XEM or XYM are not shareholders of any of the aforementioned company, and that information has no benefit (nor has it any negative in not sharing).
 We have no interest in creating the appearance that if someone holds the token, thy are shareholders.
 
 NEM and SYMBOL are one of the many initiatives that NEM Group worked on.
 As I have mentioned before multiple times, there funds are not legally considered "protocol funds". They never have been.
 
 "protocol funds" specifically means tokens that have been reserved for protocol operations, or funding of community initiatives to help the project grow, subject to discretion of th managing teams(us).
 
 So far, only NEMTUS and Opening Line have been funded(and provided viable products that would benefit the ecosystem - such as their educational technical books, or EXYM).
 
 W(as the core team)have personally funded some initiatives(such as Arcana, or Quest).
 
 Protocol funds sit in the respective NCHEST accounts on XEM or XYM.
 All entities we are working are being built to diverse business lines outside of NEM and SYMBOL to ensure they have a life beyond either protocol and bring value to the broader cryptocurrency space. ...
 Source:      "https://note.com/the_symbol_news/n/n711c2d922836"
"
-----------------------

I still wonder today how this person was able to gain so much power over NEM/SYMBOL.
In the past, this might have been called a hostile takeover.
Why is the core team personally funding initiatives like Arcana or Quest that are supposed to benefit the community and the XEM/XYM ecosystem?
There was more than enough wealth (2021) to finance this from public funds and make it available to the community (when the value of XEM/XYM had not yet crashed).

Control, influence, etc., of a small group ?
Develop your own private projects, taking advantage of the then large XEM/XYM community ?
Did the core team knowingly and deliberately cause prices to plummet ?

It seems like everyone else is just a puppet and the community is a bunch of sheep(especially in japan).
Who are the current members of the Nem Foundation, NEM group etc.?
Shouldn't these companies actually be dissolved(NEM Foundation, NEM Group, etc.) ?
Wasn't this the big announcement from @Hatchet back then ?

And the most important question ...                                                 Who are the shareholders?

thx

Another question to be placed here: ___________________________________  
when I have read the above text more carefully ....

Unfortunately I do not know the NEM/Symbol's current people.
I used to trust only to the Devs:
"Any man who can code a working blockchain can’t be all bad.”

Her face, habitus and way of speaking create an image of a person who, in my experience, is not very trustworthy. Especially the "big picture" there.
However, I must admit that she can speak quite convincingly (many may believe) - although I did not listen to the details that closely.