<<  >> (p.11)
    Author Topic: [ANN][DCN] Deepcoin secure hashing (CPU/GPU) New algo/ No premine/ No IPO/ PoW  (Read 182657 times)

    • alicea
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1050
    Merit: 501



    View Profile
    July 03, 2014, 05:31:15 PM
    Last edit: July 03, 2014, 06:51:05 PM by alicea
     #201
    It's great that there's a pool!
    How to set  difficulty-multiplier properly? Or it should always be 256? What does this parameter mean?

  • jox
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 681
    Merit: 500


    View Profile
    July 03, 2014, 07:51:39 PM
     #202
    Quote from: alicea on July 03, 2014, 05:31:15 PM
    It's great that there's a pool!
    How to set  difficulty-multiplier properly? Or it should always be 256? What does this parameter mean?

    You can set it like this:
    Code:
    sgminer -k qubitcoin -o stratum+tcp://deep.suprnova.cc:3222 -u Weblogin.WorkerName -p WorkerPassword -w 128 --difficulty-multiplier 256

    from https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/475795.0;all
    Quote
    A new option was added: --difficulty-multiplier. It allows to set stratum difficulty multiplier. For QubitCoin, Quark and Animecoin it will be usually 256. For Groestlcoin, Fuguecoin and Twecoin it will be usually 0.0039062500 (1/256). Default value is 1.0. If you have "share above target" errors then set it to 256. If difficulty required by pool is strangely large, set it to 0.0039062500 (1/256). Other values are unlikely to be used. Hopefully this will fix all remaining stratum problems.

    and for the end, you just find block #9701 on suprnova Grin

  • marada
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 442
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    July 03, 2014, 08:28:57 PM
    Last edit: July 03, 2014, 08:40:43 PM by marada
     #203
    Now have some questions to the DEVs team.
    How is the development of the website?
    Could you provide a forum?

    The coin is technically very suitable for some purposes and it soon may become a rising star.
    We need a place to create a community.

  • alicea
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1050
    Merit: 501



    View Profile
    July 03, 2014, 09:12:40 PM
     #204
    Quote from: jox on July 03, 2014, 07:51:39 PM
    Quote from: alicea on July 03, 2014, 05:31:15 PM
    It's great that there's a pool!
    How to set  difficulty-multiplier properly? Or it should always be 256? What does this parameter mean?

    Quote
    A new option was added: --difficulty-multiplier. It allows to set stratum difficulty multiplier. For QubitCoin, Quark and Animecoin it will be usually 256. For Groestlcoin, Fuguecoin and Twecoin it will be usually 0.0039062500 (1/256). Default value is 1.0. If you have "share above target" errors then set it to 256. If difficulty required by pool is strangely large, set it to 0.0039062500 (1/256). Other values are unlikely to be used. Hopefully this will fix all remaining stratum problems.
    Thank you very much for this info!!!!

    Quote from: jox on July 03, 2014, 07:51:39 PM
    and for the end, you just find block #9701 on suprnova Grin
    Grin Grin Grin

  • Markos
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 108
    Merit: 10


    View Profile
    July 03, 2014, 09:42:35 PM
     #205
    My R9 280X Vapor-X + 3 x R9 290 Tri-X, which are running on Mint 13 have a low hash rate compared to R9 280X Vapor-X on Windows. Catalysts (14.6 beta) and frequencies on R9 280X (1080/1550) are the same Sad

    Mint 13:

    R9 280X Vapor-X - 4.5 Mhash with -I 19 and -g 2
    R9 290 Tri-X @ 1000/1250 - 5.2-5.3 Mhash with -I 20 and -g 2

    Windows:

    R9 280X Vapor-X - 5.05 Mhash with -I 19 and -g 2

  • marada
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 442
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    July 03, 2014, 09:54:56 PM
     #206
    Quote from: Markos on July 03, 2014, 09:42:35 PM
    My R9 280X Vapor-X + 3 x R9 290 Tri-X, which are running on Mint 13 have a low hash rate compared to R9 280X Vapor-X on Windows. Catalysts (14.6 beta) and frequencies on R9 280X (1080/1550) are the same Sad

    Mint 13:

    R9 280X Vapor-X - 4.5 Mhash with -I 19 and -g 2
    R9 290 Tri-X @ 1000/1250 - 5.2-5.3 Mhash with -I 20 and -g 2

    Windows:

    R9 280X Vapor-X - 5.05 Mhash with -I 19 and -g 2

    I think there are different optimal settings as I have noticed with the other algos.
    The same version of fglrx doesn't necessary have to be the same under linux and windows.

    Try i.e. -g 1, try out setting I, tc or xintensity.

  • Markos
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 108
    Merit: 10


    View Profile
    July 03, 2014, 10:02:46 PM
     #207
    -g 1 is not optimal, 200-300 Khash lower than -g 2 Sad TC/xintensity is set to auto...

    What hash rates you have on other cards? I'm curious if hardware comparision for qubit algorithm exists.

  • th00ber
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 788
    Merit: 501


    View Profile
    July 03, 2014, 10:04:47 PM
     #208
    4Mh/s with a 750ti, The maxwell is doing well compare to a 280x

  • marada
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 442
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    July 03, 2014, 10:19:23 PM
     #209
    My hardware performance:

    Radeon 7950 Sapphire dual-xcore: 1100, memory: 1250, -g 1 -I 18   4,4 Mh/s
    Radeon 7950 Sapphire dual-x   core: 1200, memory: 1500, -g 1, -I 18   4,6 Mh/s
    Radeon 7950 Gigabyte core: 1100, memory: 1400, -g 1, -I 18   4,5 Mh/s
    Radeon R9 270 Gigabyte   core: 1100, memory: 1100, -g 2, -I 15   2,9 Mh/s
    Radeon 7790 Asus   core: 1200, memory: 1200, -g 1, -I 16   2,2 Mh/s
    Radeon 5570 Sapphire   core: 880, memory: 800, -g 1, -I 16   0,5 Mh/s

    The 7790 performance is surprisingly high. The card is very cool and takes about 85W.

  • Markos
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 108
    Merit: 10


    View Profile
    July 03, 2014, 10:30:24 PM
     #210
    Oh, but I think that 7950 has the best profitability. About 170-200W power consumption, 2.5x better performance and in comparison to 750Ti more versatile for other algorithms Smiley

  • marada
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 442
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    July 03, 2014, 10:37:32 PM
     #211
    750Ti is a low wattage card. Only about 60W.
    Does it mean NVIDIA outperforms radeon in this algo?

  • Markos
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 108
    Merit: 10


    View Profile
    July 03, 2014, 10:41:26 PM
     #212
    Probably yes, but versatility is what I like the most. Especially when you have cheap or free electricity Wink

  • ajeef
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 728
    Merit: 251



    View Profile
    July 03, 2014, 11:03:49 PM
     #213
    Quote from: marada on July 03, 2014, 10:37:32 PM
    750Ti is a low wattage card. Only about 60W.
    Does it mean NVIDIA outperforms radeon in this algo?

    750ti=270 many algo
    only 60W.
    But I think that AMD can also more optimized

  • marada
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 442
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    July 03, 2014, 11:15:14 PM
    Last edit: July 03, 2014, 11:58:57 PM by marada
     #214
    I hope someone optimize this algo for AMD better.
    It seems to be the future of GPU mining.

    X11/X13 is already overtaken by FPGA unfortunately.
    Is see the diff at DRK and some other coins rising to the level GPU mining became unprofitable. Sad

    Scrypt-n, due to it's extremely memory intensive design, makes cards hot and draws a lot of electricity.

    Qubitcoin algo uses the memory in the way it is hard to make ASIC or FPGA, but is more eco friendly at the other hand.

    * edit: appeared to be more my wish than true Wink

  • kahir
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1050
    Merit: 1000



    View Profile
    July 03, 2014, 11:17:40 PM
     #215
    i have 1x 7790 and 1x 260x ..... both give same hash power around 2 M/HASH or 2.1 M/HASH



    my setting



    GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
    sgminer.exe -k qubitcoin -o stratum+tcp://deep.suprnova.cc:3222 -u x -p x -I 16 -g 2 -w 64 --difficulty-multiplier 256 

  • kahir
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1050
    Merit: 1000



    View Profile
    July 03, 2014, 11:18:32 PM
     #216
    Quote from: marada on July 03, 2014, 11:15:14 PM
    I hope someone optimize this algo for AMD better.
    It seems to be the future of GPU mining.

    X11/X13 is already overtaken by FPGA unfortunately.
    Is see the diff at DRK and some other coins rising to the level GPU mining became unprofitable. Sad

    Scrypt-n, due to it's extremely memory intensive design, makes cards hot and draws a lot of electricity.

    Qubitcoin algo uses the memory in the way it is hard to make ASIC or FPGA, but is more eco friendly at the other hand.


    in fact this algo is X5 ....

    so its easier to make FPGA :d ...


    its just unknown Cheesy


    i know it from the first qubit coin

  • marada
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 442
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    July 03, 2014, 11:50:27 PM
     #217
    Quote from: kahir on July 03, 2014, 11:18:32 PM
    Quote from: marada on July 03, 2014, 11:15:14 PM
    I hope someone optimize this algo for AMD better.
    It seems to be the future of GPU mining.

    X11/X13 is already overtaken by FPGA unfortunately.
    Is see the diff at DRK and some other coins rising to the level GPU mining became unprofitable. Sad

    Scrypt-n, due to it's extremely memory intensive design, makes cards hot and draws a lot of electricity.

    Qubitcoin algo uses the memory in the way it is hard to make ASIC or FPGA, but is more eco friendly at the other hand.


    in fact this algo is X5 ....

    so its easier to make FPGA :d ...


    its just unknown Cheesy


    i know it from the first qubit coin

    Well, you may be right. I was just looking for details and found the same.
    What made me to think so was higher GPU memory temperature and how the memclock affects the hashrate.
    I used lower memclocks for x11 and had to rise it up.

  • marada
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 442
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    July 03, 2014, 11:55:45 PM
    Last edit: July 04, 2014, 12:06:01 AM by marada
     #218
    Quote from: kahir on July 03, 2014, 11:17:40 PM
    i have 1x 7790 and 1x 260x ..... both give same hash power around 2 M/HASH or 2.1 M/HASH

    my setting

    GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT=100
    sgminer.exe -k qubitcoin -o stratum+tcp://deep.suprnova.cc:3222 -u x -p x -I 16 -g 2 -w 64 --difficulty-multiplier 256  

    What the clocks?
    I found -g 1 better for 7790, but my 7790 performs just a slightly better.
    I am on linux.

  • tacee
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 386
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    July 04, 2014, 12:27:19 AM
     #219
    Quote from: marada on July 03, 2014, 11:15:14 PM
    I hope someone optimize this algo for AMD better.
    It seems to be the future of GPU mining.

    X11/X13 is already overtaken by FPGA unfortunately.
    Is see the diff at DRK and some other coins rising to the level GPU mining became unprofitable. Sad

    Scrypt-n, due to it's extremely memory intensive design, makes cards hot and draws a lot of electricity.

    Qubitcoin algo uses the memory in the way it is hard to make ASIC or FPGA, but is more eco friendly at the other hand.

    * edit: appeared to be more my wish than true Wink
    Yeah,wish some guy to optimize qubit algo on AMD cards.
    5 seperated algos of qubit are all included by X11,
     if X11/13 is cracked by FPGA, so is qubit.

  • bitcoinvideos
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 251
    Merit: 250



    View Profile
    July 04, 2014, 02:15:43 AM
     #220
    Quote from: tacee on July 04, 2014, 12:27:19 AM
    Quote from: marada on July 03, 2014, 11:15:14 PM
    I hope someone optimize this algo for AMD better.
    It seems to be the future of GPU mining.

    X11/X13 is already overtaken by FPGA unfortunately.
    Is see the diff at DRK and some other coins rising to the level GPU mining became unprofitable. Sad

    Scrypt-n, due to it's extremely memory intensive design, makes cards hot and draws a lot of electricity.

    Qubitcoin algo uses the memory in the way it is hard to make ASIC or FPGA, but is more eco friendly at the other hand.

    * edit: appeared to be more my wish than true Wink
    Yeah,wish some guy to optimize qubit algo on AMD cards.
    5 seperated algos of qubit are all included by X11,
     if X11/13 is cracked by FPGA, so is qubit.

    Ummm sorry but it's not just as "simple" as having x11 FPGA therefore qubit is...
    Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 ... 94 »
      Print  
Page 10
Viewing Page: 11

IRLBTC™ © 2025 IRLBTC.com