^^^ Are you calling the Satan the main character? I see you haven't read the Book.

But that's okay. I was just hoping that you would see (for your sake and benefit) that the science in the Bible bypasses any science that we have in this life outside of the Bible. At least Nassim Harameing is coming a bit closer to scientific reality.

The Bible is a book of science because it explains the science of the universe. How does it explain this? The universe is a complex machine full of complex machines. How do we know? We know it because we take ALL of our inventions from examples that the universe shows. Further, our inventions are ALL made out of the inventions of the universe in one way or another.

What does this have to do with proving God? Take the example of a car company. Car companies make some pretty good machines. They are far from perfect. But they are really excellent for what they are.

If there isn't a wise, guiding mind behind everything done in a car company, the cars simply won't work... or the parts won't fit together.

Look at the universe, this machine of machines. It works together way better than a car company does. And you can't even break the physics of the universe. The best you can do is convert to a different form of physics, one that is already in existence. Even destruction operates according to the physics of the universe.

Machines have makers. And the religious definition of "God" fits the Maker Who made the universe.

By this simple correlation you can see that God exists. But your denial of Him is okay. He gives you the freedom to deny Him to some extent. Just don't deny Him for too long, or you will be locking yourself into denial of reality. Kinda bad for your health.

they cannot prove "god" is a "he"(humanoid entity)

however the existance of what began everything is proven as the energy of plasma waves that created via cohesion all matter and became all things..
thus god is the energy of all things in the form of plasma waves of frequency

..
the bible is not about science proof of the origins of all things. its a collection of campfire stories to program peoples minds in a certain judgemental/moral(you choose) way

..
what if i told you the bible is not the literal science of everything, but has made attempts using childish metaphors to explain things in te way our ancestors would understand

lets put it this way
before 0AD greek scholars knew about the evolution of man from ancient cretins(cavemen) to human
they knew it was the evolution of the thyroid gland(apple shaped gland in throat)

so in later years when kids around campfires asked how did humans come to be. the science got mixed into metaphors and silly fictions to morph from the science knowledge of cretin evolution.. and turned into the 'first human eating a apple and gained wisdom and conscious freedom to seek knowledge'

also to note the word chistian comes from the old roman times post 0AD of christianus which also is related to the becoming of human from a cretin

yep the origins of christianity is actually based on the evolution from caveman to human.. its not based on humans just appearing in eden from nothing before them

this is where the bible messes things up with its edits and adaptations and campfire alterations over the centuries

lastly
in modern times if a child is born lacking a thyroid gland/thyroid function and has no medication to supplement the hormones. they would grow up as a devolved caveman like individual. thats science

The book of John (John 6:41-59) was written 80 years after Jesus died.   You have no foundation.

 

What's the difference. It simply shows that John was a guy who lived a long and brain-healthy life... assuming that you are right about this. Assuming you are right, I would call it 80 years minus 3 days since Jesus arose from the dead.

---

Anybody who accepts evolution hasn't looked at evolution theory very deeply.

All evolution theory is based on the idea of random mutations. This idea completely contradicts the law of cause-and-effect. Cause and effect says that there is no random.

The point is that 'random mutations' in evolution are simply mutations that we don't know about. But since we don't know about them, how can we know that evolution happened this way, or that it even happened?

So, the basic premise for evolution is a lie.

One other point is, science is finally recognizing that the so-called random mutations were not random, after all. But they still haven't been able to figure out what the exact mutation process was, to say nothing about proving it. If they do, will they be able to produce the next generation in the line of evolution of people? Probably it will take way too long, and Jesus will return first, and show them about God.

You stated well, regarding random. Just about the same thing that I had said. To carry it a bit further, since random is so complex that we can't tell which or what, how do we know that random even has anything to do with it? So, the evolution religion is simply another religion, with the religious leaders (scientists and those who control them) trying to make money and make a name for themselves. Sure, they don't call themselves priests. That word is for other religions. The evolution religion is better. Call them scientists.

People live in caves all over the world. You can find people who look like the evolution kind of cave people, today, if you look for it. Genetics is complex. People who live in caves don't usually go around trying to predict what is happening with their environment and genetics. And certainly scientists can't do that. Mostly what they have is talk.

Nobody is saying that mutations don't happen. What is being said is that Evolution Theory essentially states that the kind of evolution theorized by it, is something that doesn't have any basis in fact... based on the idea of random mutations. All it is, is a form of religion for certain groups of people (scientists) who don't want to accept other religions.

We could state all kinds of facts of science till the sun goes down. But when you consider two things:
1. epigenetics;
2. placebo effect;
... you see that all of genetics and so-called evolution is in the hands of anybody who wants to develop his ability to use them. Things that exist are things that God set in place, to give peple the opportunity to develop themselves into whatever they want.

God did this through Jesus - the death and resurrection of Jesus - so that now we can be children of God... or not, through unbelief. It's personal epigenetics. This is why we can find mutations doing things... because people (mostly evolution scientists) use epigenetics and placebo effect to make mutations to be real. But look at how difficult it is for them. Thousands of years of the idea of evolution, and all they have so far is a few random mutations, without any evolution fact. Without this kind of stupidity, people would be perfect, because in nature there isn't any evolution of the kind proposed in Evolution Theory. In nature without stupid people stupidly using epigenetics and placebo effect, there is only perfection.

Sneaky scientist. Want a job with prestige? Become a scientist. Test and continually retest theories. But never prove them or disprove them. Simply come close enough that the theories remain viable theories. That way you always have a job as a theory tester. Easier than digging a ditch for a living.

The fact that so extremely many people believe in religion, shows that there is something spiritual to it. So, religion is not theory... at least not the right religion. But if science hadn't made a few physical inventions that worked, it would have never gotten the strength to start in the first place.

Peer reviewing of a theory only validates the theory as a theory. We want facts. Not just the fact that the theory is a theory.

Religion tests and validates all the time. Whatever the religion, people have reasons for being part of that religion. However, often it's fear of the alternative. If they didn't test and validate it - at least as the best option for them in their life - they would leave it.

It DOES make Harry Potter real for each of them to some extent. ALL HP readers know that HP isn't real as written. Or at least they know he isn't real in their life as they live it. So, reading HP makes him real for them in the ways that they can believe and validate... in the humanness of HP and the people. If the author hadn't made HP believable, nobody would even bother with him and the books.

Your suggestion that I am attempting to say that science isn't real is as flawed as your faith in science. After all, science - the knowledge of the physics interactions in the universe - is way beyond what anybody can understand. We don't even know that programming all known scientific info into an AI computer will give us the answers.

If you want to see the big flaw in scientific consensus, look up The Highwire here - https://www.bitchute.com/channel/okiFK5CwQrZS/ - and here - https://thehighwire.com/. Then watch the weekly videos for the last 3 years. What you will find is that there are loads of scientists who have good factual understanding and knowledge that the scientific consensus regarding Covid and the Covid vaxx is pure baloney.

What will you really be watching in these videos? The politicization of science. Science has become a religion just like any other religion. If it doesn't straighten up people will stop believing it.