Haha..xD science cannot proof the existence of god 

But if there were simple proof... simple proof that stood out in the open like 1+1=2... nobody could make you accept it. So, what's the difference.

The scientific proof for the existence of God is available. That doesn't make you accept the proof. Only God will make you accept the proof, when He raises you from the dead in the resurrection.

Did you mean the science of philosophy?   

Nice joke dude Like it

Color me nutty, I think things that can be proven right in front of me are fact.

What kind of nutty color do you want to be colored?

Nutty is to:
1. Take a bunch of science facts (and maybe some non-facts, as well)...
2. And put them together in such a way that the result is something new that is not known to be fact...
3. And then use probability to guestimate how close this new thing might be to actually being a fact...
4. And then if you FEEL it is close enough to being a fact, and any number of your contemporaries ALSO FEEL that it is close enough to fact, simply start believing it is fact, and start expressing it as such.

This is what almost the whole scientific community does all the time. In fact, they do it so well and often these days, that you can get just about any non-factual thing called a science theory, then a fact, and then start a new religion around it.

No, deep. Examine things in detail before using derp on them.

For example. Science recognizes the existence of countless trillions upon trillions of cause and effect actions in the universe. Yet they have not found even one reaction that is provably randomly caused. Because of intelligence of mankind being in the universe, it was caused. And only something with more intelligence could cause it without any random existing.

This is why the scientists are looking to replace fact with theory. They don't want the founding Intelligence to be the Source of everything. But they can't change the facts.

There are lots of common things in life and the world that are not scientific... simply because they have not been authorized by the scientific community to be scientific. Yet they exist in common and natural form all around us.

In other words, scientific reasons don't mean much of anything regarding reality.

No human can offer any scientific proof he does exist any more than he does not exist even though a fool could see the design of both earth and the heavens could not have come from a disorderd existence.I believe faith or lack of it is what causes belief or non belief in such matters however I do have scientific proof that the majority of humans are sheeple who can be led in any direction once they are herded into groupthink but getting back to the question of God's existence does anyone not consider that the very fact we live on a planet that is suspended on nothing with a moon at an ideal distance and rotates at a specific angle on its axis which orbits in an elliptical way around the sun without coming too close or too distant in order to function in a manner that supports life is partial proof that if there is a God he is smarter than the planet of apes who now inhabit earth and seek to question his omnipotence?


Then on the flip side we have the divine fallacy argument.I can't figure this out, so a god must have done it. Or, This is amazing; therefore, a god did it. Or, I can't think of any other explanation; therefore, a god did it. Or, this is just too weird; so, a god is behind it but maybe faith is also a different form of reasoning that humans cannot understand and the scientific community would refer to any turning to such ideas to form conclusions when there are no other answers as non sequitir but isnt it said? "his ways are not our ways"