BADecker's evidence in a nutshell......

Link 1
Machine like nature of the universe.
Cause and effect
Nations looking for God?
BADecker believes that all machines are ultimately the result of a god.

Link 2
Cause and effect

Link 3
Cause and effect

Link 4
Cause and effect

Cause and effect rebuttal
If cause and effect is proof of a god, then who made god? Was it god's god? And who made god's god? was it god's god's god? This is a cycle of infinity. This is no proof.
BADecker simply applies an assumption that  this a god. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uC7Ttc9g1u8   

Machines like nature of the universe rebuttal
BADecker believes that machines need a maker and that maker has to be a god. The reality of this is that evolution has caused the changes. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v481/n7381/full/nature10724.html   

BADecker then claims that this is only theory. The reality is that science is disproving/proving all theories  we (humans) have believed for years. That is the nature of science. For it to be tested by others. People like BADecker will continually use their same argument of assumptions to state there is no proof that god does not exist. The reality is that history has shown that early Vikings believed  "lightning flashed whenever Thor threw his hammer". Science has proven this incorrect.

Nations looking for god rebuttal
BADecker claims that people are looking for how the universe was made. This is true. However, BADecker then claims that because the answers are still not found, the answer must be a god. WRONG.... this is not proof. This is an assumption again on BADecker's part. Science is unlocking secrets every day. Religion is being disproven daily and BADecker continues to hold on to his mindless views.

Thanks, again, for helping to solidify the scientific proof that God exists,
by showing a bunch of religion in your post,
and by not showing any rebuttal to the scientific proof that God exists.

Are you done with eating shit? Are you happy now, after going around my argument and just coming up with some cultist bullshit? God does not exist. Until there will be a clear, solid proof of a deity, you get the fuck out of here and go eat shit at your local church, that's where you are welcome. If you don't get it the first time, no worry, I'll be here daily to remind people what a hypocrite piece of shit you are and to remind you to fuck off. Much love from a guy who doesn't take kindly to cultists. Now fuck off.

Skeptics are comfortable with Evolution but uncomfortable with the Survival hypothesis.
Understanding the evidence supporting survival takes time but it is worth it.
Rebirth is typically a key element of authentic spiritual teachings, this suggests that there should be empirical evidence of Survival. I have posted many examples of this kind of evidence, but never have I seen someone quote it and state that "this evidence could be better explained without Survival because..."

Know this: if your 'evidence' would be at least the fraction of an interesting idea, at least someone would argue with you over it. Nobody gives a plain fuck about your hypothesis because it is as delusional and dumb as you are. Go home, you're completely drunk and irrecuperable.

That was my opinion about your hypothesis that you repeatedly posted and nobody even took the time to say how dumb it is. I did not say you don't have the right to express your opinion, I just said it's as dumb as a rock. Notice one thing: the fear that the whole world will go nuts if there is concrete proof of a deity. In the meantime, apologists claim there is a God. They also claim that nobody would ever publish evidence of a God because that would blow up the society so what they interpret as proof is good but nobody would ever recognise it because they fear the change. But that proof would only make us sure that there is a God. At the moment, most of the human beings are already sure that there is a God, without having any proof or evidence of such a thing. So why would the proof be something bad? I'll tell you why: because there is no proof. All the apologists know there is no proof, all these cultist fuckers are aware their proof is complete bullshit so all they have to do is make it look like the scientists, the governments, the media, would never allow such proof to be seen because it would cause instability. That's the only thing apologists can do, blame some people for not publishing their bullshit, creating conspiracies. Deep down they all know it's all bullshit. The hypocrisy of apologists like you or Badecker is that you guys know it's bullshit but you let it be so, because people need to believe in something. You don't respect human beings, you consider yourselves above and you think people need your lies to be better. I've seen many like you, I've even seen apologists who don't believe a single word in the bible but claim that people must follow the teachings of Jesus. Not them, but other people. That is why I am so rude, because all of my curse words can never make up for the shameless insults you bring against all humanity with your hypocrisy and lack of morality. Are you pleased now, apologist?

No, dumb fuck, scientific laws are not interpretation. Your bullshit is an interpretation of scientific laws and it is complete fantasy. Stop coming up with hypocrite ways of persuading this discussion in your favour, it will not work. Please fuck off and try to find your own ideas instead of pasting the same links that you've learnt on Bob Dutko's bullshit cd's. Apologist.

You are getting to be more like Horace all the time... lots of talk, but nothing to back up anything you say.

More talk from you.

Anybody can say that there are cultures older than 10,000 years. But when you get into the details of how they determined this, you find that they really don't know, that their ages are guestimations at best.

There is evidence that some of the earlier pyramids, and the great pyramid were built before the flood. However, what does the Flood have to do with building the pyramids? Those people were less into entropy than we are, and had a lot more strength, and a lot more reproduction fertility. Populations sprang up much faster.

You don't know that you needed any slaves at all to build the pyramids. Some 5-y-o evidence says that the builders were hired professionals.

You are as ignorant as the flat Earthers you deny everything that does not fit your world view.  No matter how strong the proof against it is.