Since the only things that exist are machines, we can apply the example of the machines that we know the makers of, to the big machine that we don't see the maker of, to show that it has a Maker.

I believe in this, but as long as he existed, but he died and now he helps us to find the right path from heaven.

The scientist never ever created even a cell. So there must be a God, who created the whole humans,trees,mountains etc. I'll believe until world collapses.

Yes we got inspired by nature to create stuff but that still doesn't mean that nature itself is designed, there is no way to tell. We can only tell our stuff is designed/made because we know about it or we can compare it to nature, however when you look at nature and you try to guess if it's designed or not, you can't. There is nothing to compare it to, there is nothing that says it's designed.

No, no, no. Gödel's first incompleteness theorem is just a result about the limitations of axiom systems. That's all. It is particularly worrying when people state that they have little knowledge of mathematics (let alone of mathematical logic) yet feel certain that there is something metaphysically profound going on here.

All the misinterpretations out there of Gödel's results on incompletenesss prompted the late Swedish logician Torkel Franzén to write a book called
Gödel's Theorem: An Incomplete Guide to Its Use and Abuse.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_ontological_proof#Criticism

There's no proof that god is real but you can feel it the way you trust god and pray for it. you will have good heart

I've heard two good analogies:

a) The Painter: If someone looked at the Mona Lisa and said that they believe that a few jars of paint somehow happened to fall onto a blank canvas that just happened to be there and that the paint just happened to fall in such a way that the painting dried as it was, would you hold that that was a plausible theory, or would you hold that the artwork was proof of the painter?
b) If someone told you that the private plane in their backyard resulted from a tornado going through a junkyard and rearranging the parts in such a way that they just happened to form a plane, what would your response be?

So, to with G-d an creation. However, creation and natural balance are far more complex than either scenario provided above. To say that everything somehow just happened to form in the same way with all mutations happening in such a way as to allow for the existence of all planets and life-forms to provide for the needs of all others in such a harmonious way is even less statistically probable.

"It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it."

Albert Einstein, letter to an atheist (1954), quoted in "Albert Einstein: The Human Side," edited by Helen Dukas & Banesh Hoffman.

"The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this."

Letter to philosopher Eric Gutkind, January 3, 1954.

Einstein was not religious and to say so is another lie used by bible thumpers to further their agenda.

Time for you to learn.



When you look at some parts of the definitions above, you will see that Einstein absolutely was religious... and so are you.

But the data shows that God exists.