Understood, I'm just trying to see if bitcoin 2.0 is truly possible, if something so good can be made that even the main stream begin using it because of the convenience and function it provides. When i started work here, I wasn't aware of the overall troll demographic and i was honest with everyone I met, including smurf.

The Facts:

Yes I paid Dan to help with some works that were in progress yet uncompleted. The guy is the best developer I know of. I don't see a problem with a mutually agreed upon contract between 2 people to complete a project.. But you guys might.

Yes, I am heavily invested in Utility coin. I am not afraid to brag my balance on Bittrex and show that I am a large holder despite the markets previous downtrend.

Yes, I was indeed working on my own supernet it was to be called Utilnet and it was NOT to be an ICO. Several days later Dan Metcalf came back and told me about blocknet. As much as i do not like ICO, i chose to support it because Dan had the unifying power to bring in developers where I did not.

No, I do not have any access to ICO funds

No, I am not going to receive any ICO funds. I'm merely an investor in coins I feel will have a worthwhile technology.

No, I am not Dan Metcalf. Take the tin foil hats off.

pr0m3theus2013,

Can you clarify a few of the points brought up here please?

Was Dan Metcalf the developer behind Halcyon and Utilitycoin?

How long have you been working with Dan?

Unless the devs are complete sociopaths there is usually a motive.

And I think I found it. It is public info, but I will hold off publishing it.
Basically he owes a good bit a money to more than one entity.

It also, explains the gap in activity on atcsecure's acct (Dan Metcalf).
Because these things occurred right at the first of the year.

Now if prometheus is dan then when he uses the prometheus acct he is good at always using English spellings ie. color vs colour
Dan is located in the US and always uses american spellings. At least regarding the posts I reviewed.

But what is still odd to me is that the same rough gap in activity is both for
atcsecure (Dan) and
Prometheus and
synechist (pr for xc/block)
at the end of last year and beginning of this year.

synechist is based in oxford though. maybe he is prometheus?

But Teka also has the first name Dan. maybe he is prometheus?

3 out of 4 disappear for a period of time.
and a differing
3 out of 4 are named Dan.

The 10% discount to buy into block with the other coins in the network is a nice little touch to get rid of the last of their bags before all the prices dumped to zero.

More info coming...

Oh and yes, I have a crypto related chat that Dan is a member of... It's not a P&D crew.. it's just a hangout with me and people I like. Many members exchange tips there, I often will talk about coins i like.. a bit about TA and where I am on my projects. It is NOT a pump and dump crew at all.

the only thing on your mind is PND lol...

come on dude don't hold back

They did a refund on ClusterCoin! There is a precedence

I highly doubt that any of these people are the same person. That doesn't make sense and it's just distracting people from getting the answers to the questions that actually matter like whether or not Dan Metcalf is the developer for HAL and UTIL.

Bittrex and all exchanges are far worse scammers than anyone mentioned here.
By the way, I have never once heard anyone complain when the coin they were in was getting pumped. I'm sure that goes for everyone bitching about it in here.