What you have to understand is that civil prosecution is part of this process of ostracization. If there were a case in Alberto's past in which someone had taken him to court, Meni (and us investors) might have avoided this altogether.

Yes, the government and its thugs own a monopoly on violence. I'll give you that, but at the same time no one wants to talk sociology right now.

~pyotr

like your ppt?

You were supposedly filing charges against Pirate, that didnt stop you from selling (and even creating fresh) pirate debt.

this ones good, looks like alberto is going to have to work his ass off in the famliy restaurant for the next 5 years, lol

Maybe you should lock this thread then, to stop the trolling and spread of misinformation.  Only unlock to post updates or allow discussion of updates.

Thank you for pushing this. But please do not take promises to pay too serious - could also be typical delay tactics.

I suppose criminal prosecution will work quite well within EU member states. And the evidence in this case seems sufficient to justify prosecution ''in public interest''.
Well, let's wait a (little) bit to see if Alberto is able to resolve this...

of course, in USA banks  and goverment use  extortion to get back their loans and taxes then. ( goverment does it really, but acording to the law)

Why are some people defending to a scammer who doesn't honor his contract?.

If we want bitcoin has any future, "BTC rules" have to be followed for everyone .

The topic of this thread is the bond, not Bitdaytrade itself (which probably is also a scam, but not a ponzi). This 3% per week "bond" had all the hallmarks of a ponzi and the same predictable and predicted outcome as a ponzi.

Haha I was just going through my account history CSV the other day. I was curious and looked - my first trade was for one share of BDT.

It's nothing like a ponzi. The characteristic of a ponzi is that the underlying business is kept hidden and actually does not exist; in this case the business was specified and did exist (whatever problems it had). The other characteristic is that it is growing, in this case it was an issue for a set amount.

If you take for example nrd525's ponzi indicators it passes about 2 out of 9.

My only knowledge of Alberto's assets is from his own words. His reported status doesn't seem very consistent so it's not clear if he can't pay, won't pay, or will pay (face value) given some time to liquidate assets.


I will not dignify MPOE-PR's comment with a response.