LOLOL.

How flat is flat as fuck and why wouldn't you take a picture/video of the dome/edge to prove once and for all the earth is flat? Seems fishy.

There's no way to get to the edge of the earth based on a flat earth model, there's a huge ice wall that nobody has ever been able to cross. This model has been replicated in real life with the sun and moon rotating. No scientist has ever been able to replicate a model with the earth as a globe in the universe.

Any of these models have been proven wrong many times over.




Now some real science, observable and will repeat, the Moons "Northern", "Southern" part and at the equator.

Northern half Southern half

and the different stages


If any one has any link or time-laps videos of the direction Moon turns (anti or clockwise) at equator from n to u like to see it.
Also if great interest moon phases at 8° south of equator.
Later in the year i may even consider travel myself and film it, great interest.

Every film is a multi-layer, just arranged in sequential, CT, or CAT scans fitting description. A very rough res would be like a 24 deck of cards move every hour.

  ^{[refraction bending up]}



I love how when viewing a ship vanishing at the horizon suddenly refraction (and perspective) doesn't exist. The flat earther is a retarded idiot for not accepting the ship went up, over and behind a convex dome of water thus proving the globe.

  
  ^{[no refraction]}


How about Eratosthenes experiments with sticks and/or wells and the shadows cast? It's funny that refraction doesn't exist for that experiment and the flat earther is a retarded idiot for not accepting that the shadows prove the globe.

  
  ^{[no refraction]}



What about when somebody posts a video to YouTube they made with their P900 of a lighthouse, the entire lighthouse including the shore being visible when it should be hidden by curvature. The globalist claims refraction lifted the lighthouse up allowing us to see behind the curve of the earth, and claims the flat earther is a retarded idiot for not understanding science.

  
  ^{[refraction bending up]}


So what the fuck, refraction bends up when they need it to then doesn't exist when it's convenient? Mate you should go off yourself quietly instead of promoting this fucking conspiracy.

Is this supposed to sound as a valid argument?

Bullshit you say? You're neglecting the fact that you [globalist] claim we're rotating at 15°/hour and, that angular motion of a constant velocity causes an acceleration with somewhere in the neighborhood of ~14 grams of force being imparted on the average person. A person can't feel 14g of force you say?



He wants you [the reader] to drive to the mountains so your ears will pop and you'll be disoriented. Balance is your sixth sense not that Hollywood and sci-fi BS, the 3rd eye is a fucking eye and it's part of your vision motherfuckers! The Earth is motionless.

High altitudes can also fuck up your car, it might go into safemode or shutdown completely and you'll have to tow it back to the dealer for a reset and a massive bill, dealerships you know, oh and towing from the top of a mountain, LOL!

---

---

Hey BADecker tell us, does refraction make a light source appear higher or lower?

because you know.... our buddy xempy here is very educated and he never posts gibberish nonsense....

LMFAO

^^^ The textured surface would grind against you as it turns, not only would you feel it but you're likely to get an Indian burn.

 "modern science" being completely devoid of the scientific method refuses to acknowledge that Relativity has been falsified by direct measurement. Apparently the "official global narrative" being force fed to the masses takes precedent over the facts.

Time-frames of billions of years is unreasonable, there's no proof of these ridiculous spans of time on Earth. The creation story told by "modern science" to support the "official global narrative" is the only reason this fallacy exists.

You claim the Earth is rotating, thus it would experience a constant acceleration. What kind of science claims acceleration is the same as a constant velocity? Who's peddling nonsense here asshole?



fake edit:
Gravity is an unproven theory created by "modern science" to support the "official global narrative" and doesn't adequately explain, the lack of an explosion the shear stress an Earth sized flywheel made of molten lava would create, not to mention how it can allow an 8,000 mile wide flywheel spinning a 1,000 MPH out of a liquid with no container.