What's the matter? I busted your false religion, so what else can I expect, right?

Proving the earth is flat isn't the only thing you can do with your new P950. Dude with a camera at the beach turns the lens on the rocks and exposes the past!

   BLOODY GIANTS - Mudfossils (Eden, NSW) -- https://youtu.be/0UNH7a0uHwo (8:25)

^^^ We're not on a spinning wet rock in a hard vacuum. Everything based on that nonsense is also nonsense, this includes any sciences that rely on that model. The earth is not a geoid or any variation thereof thus, the science of geology is a fraud.

All rock formations are fossils, giant fossils or a concrete mix made from from fossils and fossilized material. There's giant chunks of flesh hiding in plain sight everywhere!

Also, the horizon is completely flat and rises to eye level, shit like this is right in your stupid face in plain sight, and you can't see it. Not only are you too stunned to see what's right in your face, you fucking argue with me about it, and act like I believe fairy tales or some shit.



Have a dolphin-eel hybrid, fuck that thing!

^^^ Anything I believe has no real teeth, it's what I know that counts. I know the globe is nonsense because I can prove it with preponderance of objective evidence.

You on the other hand take the low energy path and rely completely on faith, faith that what you're being told about the world around you is actually true. What I say radically contradicts with what you learned in school, the fictional universe that all TV shows, movies & books share in common and of course, NASA propaganda. Instead of analyzing what I say, you steadfastly refuse to expend any energy whatsoever, instead of thinking you knee-jerk like a knee-jerking jerk-off jerking off!

^^^ If you don't make the assumption that the sun is millions of miles away with parallel rays and, if a close small sun with divergent rays is taken into consideration then the math works out the same.

This answer is often met by the globalist doubling down and claiming that, by adding a 3rd angle the globe is proven but, this is nonsense. They disregard the atmosphere and hijack the effect refraction causes falsely claiming that the earth curves.

The fact the surface of the earth is a stationary extended plain also agrees with earth's magnetic field just fine.

So that at the north pole we have a perpendicular position to the magnetic near the earth’s field, but not at another latitude, the center of the magnetic field source should be exactly under the north pole. And I get a rather strange and simple question - the question of weight. This is measured as m (macca) * g (currently). g = G * M R ^ 2, where G is the constant constant, M is the body weight, which attracts (Earth's body), and R is the period of the whole and whole
According to this form, what we can get is yours to be reduced with close to linear dependence. To the north, you’ll need to enter one number, and about the equator - completely different, less than one. If you do not understand why, you can paint.




Yes, all this is considered, but the argument in the style of "This is all a fraud" and further there is no point in developing this topic. There are more fundamental ways to confirm that the earth is an ellipsoid. I like the dilemma with the weight that arises from the hypothesis with a flat Earth, because we know that we weigh about the same throughout the Earth. This is the fundamental law of physics (the fact of the interaction between two bodies, as a result of which gives rise to
 attraction) and rejecting it, we reject too much that, even if desired, can not be manipulated.

We are interested not in the shape of the magnet, but in the fact of the presence of a magnetic field. The way the poles are distributed does not matter.

The strength of the Coulomb interaction (F = q1 * q2 (4 * 3.14 * E0 * r ^ 2) does not affect the objects of interest to us, because q speaks of the distribution of the charge, and not the fact of its presence (It works only for material points in the form in which you indicated.) We are interested in the gravity formula. Since the weight is mg = G * m * M R ^ 2, then we can calculate how much a person will weigh in the center of the disk and on its edge.

In the center of the disk it will weigh: G * m * M0 R0 ^ 2

where M0 is the weight of the planet.

At the edge of the disc, it will weigh G * m * M0 * L R1 ^ 2.
By the Pythagorean theorem, R1 ^ 2 = R0 ^ 2 + the distance from the center to the edge of the disk squared  (= R2). The proportionality coefficient L is valid for mass and it is proportional to R0 R1, and since in the case of R0 = R1 it is equal to 1, we can say with confidence that it is equal to R0 R1 We get in the second case the weight of the person. Let’s take a look at this from the whole and see what difference will be = G*M0*m (1/R0^2 - L/R1^2) = G*M0*m*R0(1/R0*R0*R0 - 1/(R0^2 + R2^2)^(3/2)).


Equality is achieved only if R0 ^ 3 = (R0 ^ 2 + R2 ^ 2) ^ 1.5 => R0^6 = R0^6 + 3*(R0^4)*(R2^2) + 3*(R0^2)(R2^4) + R2^6 => 3R0^4 + 3*(R0R2)^2 + (R2)^4 = 0 ===>  We have reached an obvious problem, that is, this expression can be 0 only if R0 and R1 and R2 are equal to zero. We get that the earth can be flat only if it is a material point (an object without size).


There are also many everyday examples that confirm that the earth is round. For example, the strength of Coriolis. The only assumption we make to prove it is that the earth is round. Everything else is rigorous math. There are many experimental installations that show and prove the power of Coriolis.


Also, during construction, a special device is used, which indicates the direction of the normal reaction force of the support, which in turn consists of two components. It is made on the assumption that the earth is round. In the case of flat earth, the houses between the equator and the south pole would have collapsed long ago, since there the angle would differ by a very large amount.

There are infinitely many such examples, but the catch itself is that it is useless to argue with physics, you need to be a complete nerd to not believe in this fundamental science, and there are a lot of experiments that can confirm that the earth is round. You can search it in google

But on a flat Earth, the whole idea of magnetism and the earth changes. The center of notbatman's flat Earth is approximately the North Pole. The compass, also, points toward this NP, no matter where on Earth we hold the compass.

On this FE, the other end of the compass points to the ring of ice, no matter where we are on the earth. This means that the south magnetic pole is something that surrounds the earth. It also means that FE polar magnetism is something that is quite different than a simple globe type of magnetism. Or is it that we don't understand magnetism at all, and only FE people are coming close to understanding?

When the compass is at the magnetic north pole, it will try to point down, the needle standing on end. It's the same (but the other end) with the needle at the magnetic south pole. There isn't any corresponding FE magnetic operation that explains this without changing the whole physics of Earth magnetism.

At http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2015/08/200-proofs-earth-is-not-spinning-ball.html, you will find loads of simple points about why the earth is flat. But many of them are simply wording that twists the mind of an average person by subtly lying about a situation and condition. I have explained several of these in previous posts. Flat Earth doesn't fit what exists.



Why would you think that I think that "there is no point in developing this topic?" Do I not further develop the topic (in an adverse direction, of course) on a reasonably regular basis? Look at my posts.

The important point in developing, is that there are many people who are brought to the point of doubt about globe Earth when they read the FE tricks. Development is simply teaching folks how FE not only is an impossibility, but also is easily shown to be false through reasonably common, simple methods.

Where, really, is notbatman in his thinking? Does he really think that he "knows" that the earth is flat? Or does he simply believe, and answer with technicalities that he gets from FE cohorts? Or is he the mouthpiece of an organization that is trying to propagandize anybody they can?

In the event that he is innocently a believer, perhaps we should teach him? In the even that he is a troll, and has a knowledgeable group working with him, maybe we should teach others.

^^^ You say that like your paycheck depends on it.

You are talking about some obscure experiments, and I'm talking about the laws and forces that everyone uses - the Coriolis force - in the military body and aerodynamics, the strength of the normal reaction of the support - in construction. These are the ones that I mentioned earlier. And the experiments of individual scientists do not make sense until they are confirmed by hundreds of others. Standard experiments are confirmed hundreds of thousands of times a year, because they are conducted at universities in physics departments. You are off topic. Prove that the Coriolis force does not exist, and then refute the presence of a normal support reaction, then we can discuss some other experiments.