Since you seem to enjoy twisting what the Bible says, you aren't any different than the anti-God atheists.

You skip right on by the place where God made the sky... verse 6. God placed the materials for making the sun and stars, yes, and even the moon, into the sky that He made when He separated the muddy waters.

Because God was working with the waters on Earth, He simply calls them the waters under the sky. He never says that he left the waters above the sky together in one sea, or that the waters above the sky were not in other parts of the sky. After all, if you were on one of those spheres of water, it would seem that all the other spheres of water were above the sky, as well.

The Bible isn't there for its description of the shape of the earth. But you can tell that the earth is something like a sphere if you read all the parts together. Then, modern (and some not so modern) technology proves that the Bible is right.

Besides, if you were so Bible inclined, and such a righteous person, you would at least give me the benefit of the doubt, for saying things that are easily right, even if they are not. You treat me like I am a sleazebag, something a Bible person wouldn't do. So, you prove that you are misusing the Bible when you do this, because you are being unrighteous.

With regard to this link, https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/5222193.msg53798756#msg53798756, The heavens are God's throne. You sit on a throne, like God sits on the heavens... outside of the universe, sitting on the shell of the universe. But the earth is His footstool, because He has made Himself to exist within the universe, and to walk upon the earth with men... in the form of Jesus.

You are missing it quite badly.

@canovan25,

   The coriolis effect is nonsense bruh, you're making claims without sources, facts or, even logic. Your argument is based on an appeal to authority and an engineered consensus.

The aether drift, as experimentally proven in the Michelson–Gale–Pearson experiment (1925) is the only measurable source of rotational motion and, it's such a small force that an ultra-sensitive measurement device such as an optical interferometer is required to measure it.

The fact you're insisting that I prove a negative means this discussion has come to an end.

   [Ultimate Flat Earth Proof] Stationary Flat Earth – The Gyroscope Doesn't Lie -- https://youtu.be/RF829QNKtT8

^^^ Folks, he thinks I should bow to the authority of students.



He then goes on about documented video evidence of a reproducible experiment being fabricated...

Oh, and peer reviewed, meticulously documented and replicated (Silvertooth & USAF 1986) physical experiments, such as M&M 1887 are "some obscure experiments". That's right, he claims M&M 1887 is too obscure for me to use as objective evidence.

   U.S. Army Sniper "No Coriolis Effect In Long Distance Shots" -- https://youtu.be/JkeAitzFsm4



edit:
Moving on to the earth being an extended plain and the mountain shadow, its peak has a grater angle of attack to the apparent horizon than its base thus, the optical compression that occurs starting at the base of the sun is expanded, bringing the sun so it's within the angular limits of the angular size limit of the eye or camera or the diffraction grating created by the apex.

The peak is technically an eye *****.

I twisted nothing, just read what it states, you jesuitic false accuser.

You don't interpret The Bible, especially not with your jesuit filth. Let The bible interpret the Bible. You have zero rights to make up your own crap interpretations of the Holy Scriptures.

Here we go again:

^ rāqîaʿ

"...the firmament is the vast solid dome created by God on the second day to divide the primal sea (called tehom) into upper and lower portions so that the dry land could appear..." -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firmament

Possibly the most solid thing in the universe is the dome. The dome is, essentially, empty space. It reaches throughout all material into the emptiness where material barely exists. It is many light-years "high," and contains all material things, flowing through them.

This is what is said in Genesis chapter 1, especially verses 6 thru 9. How do we know that Genesis says this, even though Genesis doesn't talk about light-years? Because we have found that it is light-years in fact. So, that is what Genesis is saying.

Since any BS I might have, is something that doesn't have anything to do with the shape of the earth, I'll simply pass on this off-topic question.

However, to remain on-topic, I ask you your own question?

Two wackaloons in a pissing contest  debating which sky fairy version is correct in a bitcointalk thread
started and starring a third wackaloon who has trolled flat earth nonsense word salads for almost 5 years on a daily basis.

You can't make this shit up if you tried.....

In answer to your question, kinda no. What I mean is, if you are standing at the North Pole, the heavens are light-years high above you and the North Pole. But they aren't light-years high above the South Pole, because the South Pole is "under" you almost 8,000 miles, and the heavens that are light-years away in the direction of the South Pole, are light-years "low"... at least until you go to the South Pole. Then the heavens are light-years high above you.

Remember that St. Paul talked about being caught up to the third heaven. We have 3 heavens in simple general. The first is a layer that is the atmosphere above Earth, and it includes what we call inner space where the ISS orbits.  The second is the thing that we call outer space.

The third is God's heavenly home: Heaven is God's throne; the earth is His footstool. His heavenly home is a "space" outside of the universe, that essentially "surrounds" the universe.

So what happened to the waters from above the firmament that were so.?

And where did the universe come in or is that the same thing in your book?