I'm starting think you guys on more than just the sauce.


I crafted an image depicting just that and posted it a while back:

Why don't you two come back when you can provide some proof, any proof at all that the Earth is a spinning globe. I've provided a whole lot of evidence that it's flat and undeniable proof (Airy's failure experiment) that it's motionless. Because right you guys look like total fools trying to say there's curvature in that photo while ignoring the fact there's a hot spot under the Sun.

I suspect the signals are ground based and they bounce them off the ionosphere. There are several other possibilities I can think of but that seems the most likely.

Why don't you tell me how a sun 3,000 miles in altitude illuminates the bottom of the cloud layer after sunset, but doesn't illuminate the top of the cloud layer?  Light isn't a boomerang.

Oh, the incredible irony of asking for pictures.  Perfect -- ignore all photos that don't match your thinking, unquestioningly accept all photos that do, and make immediate, unreasonable demands for personal photos about scenarios that are so common and that literally thousands of people experience every single day (when a better alternative is to pull your head out of your ass).

Let's simplify it since this is apparently so difficult for you -- just after sunset, your 3,000 mile-high sun illuminates the bottom of the clouds, but not the fucking ground.  Show me your MS Paint skills for that scenario.

But you don't trust pictures, remember? 

Obviously it is flat, how else would we be able to walk? I called it.

earths structure likes a baloon. its growing slowly and grounds far away between them slowly.

Agreed.

Also this one is "a must watch".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBxiJfs_mxc

Thanks to the uploader for his hard work.

Movement is now really gaining momentum.