I don't understand what's the point of doing this.

I can solve your pubKey (or any other 75-bit public key for that matter) in at most 10 seconds from the moment it's grabbed from the mempool initial TX.

great!

And the Philosopher, Alberto and Nomachine, they just remain quiet on the topic of bots. Even though they were the first here to discuss it.

There's the semi-ethical issue that some adhere to. In my view, equal to hiding the shit under the carpet and pretending no one smells it. Maybe that works in fiat economy (everyone pretends they're fine though public debt only goes up exponentially), but not with math.

The basis of Bitcoin having any value is properly managing the security of the keys. If one is dumb enough to not grasp this concept, they well deserve their TX to be replaced, because they failed to understand the fundamentals: your key = your money. Not your key, not your money. And it's not your key if you basically spread it to everyone, everywhere.

There's a simple fix for that: don't do it at all. Don't trust Mara? Then don't attempt to solve weak puzzles, just to later complain your investment went down the drain.

Bro, that doesn’t make any sense. Bots are fast, use the 100 bit range instead.
We have done test and I can confirm that will be done within seconds .. increase the range if you want real fun

Again:( Miners Thanks bro )

   

Dear Sir what us your opinion on using slipstream usage ? Not on the concept but on the website crediibility ? Can you beleive them ?

Satoshi himself kindly disagrees. Whoever has the key, owns the funds. Now, my friend should just use private key 0x01 and transfer his life savings into that address, right? No one will ever touch it.

Last time I checked, it wasn't unethical or illegal to add two numbers together.

What's next, unethical to use quantum computers to break all cryptocurrencies? Seriously? You'd need to have a word with China about how non-ethical it is to break RSA first, since they just did that, before getting slammed by all big tech giants following along.

Online casino is "very ethical" business Playing on poor people souls weaknesses.

I have to disagree on this one. People don't HAVE to gamble. If you insert the "people are weak" argument, you would have to get rid of almost everything people genuinely enjoy doing. We need to take accountability for our own actions/choices.

Does anyone really think the creator of this puzzle didn’t anticipate what would happen with any puzzle under 100 bits? I’m still convinced this was a pre-planned scam. Unless the puzzle’s creator personally convinces me here otherwise.