If they won - where did their prize go?   

Calculations were good. It’s just statistics. Sometimes that 1% wins, and that’s ok.
You seem happy to be able to gloat, not sure why. But sure thing, enjoy 😉

Personally i would prefer for Bram to take the 69 puzzle instead of losing the puzzle to the bots
He has been transparent with you all , i dont know why some of you guys are so mean and jealous

Everyone thinks, Why is the 69th wallet lost?
Is there any evidence on this subject?
(It may seem like this according to the Tx.)

But information was given about this subject before.

It could also be a baiting incident.

You give the 1st order, then overwrites with the 2nd order, overwrites with the 3rd order.
As a result, the money goes to one of the two wallets.
The owner of both wallets could be the same person.


Edit;

I don't think anyone is jealous about Bram.
Those who argue that it wasn't a fair fight. (He said a low percentage like 1%)

Sometimes the numbers thinking big doesn't change the result.

If this event is considered a victory for the 1%, it has become a great success and hope for other friends.

In short, think like this.

For the 67th puzzle = He spent an average of 300 thousand dollars = He earned 550 thousand dollars.
For the 68th puzzle = He spent an average of 350 thousand dollars = He earned 580 thousand dollars.

As a result, he earned the money he would have earned from a single wallet from 2 wallets. Yes, it may seem logical. But how many people are investors? If you divide the 500 thousand dollars gain by 10 people, 50 thousand dollars remains. This doesn't make any sense.

Now, while searching for the 69th wallet, he lost an average of 250 thousand dollars.

When you think in more detail, it doesn't make any sense for 10-20 thousand dollars.

I wonder how much time you spent arriving at this formidable discoveries. Who'd of guessed that 1 == N + 1 mod N


Oddly enough, I'm lost interpreting your post.

I did not, we went for a risk reward play based on the info we had. I don’t think it’s that hard to understand.

So next time when someone tells you that he will take the prize with >99% probability, laugh 

Yesterday, I sent you my proposal for a statistical method that reduces the 2^70 key space for puzzle 71 by 7.22%. Did you see it?

No, on a statistical plot the chances were, due to scale of his operation, most likely theirs. The maths was accurate that all other parties, due to be so segmented and not working together, were highly unlikely to beat his operation. All random participants were taking into account. What cannot be taken into account is blind luck and random chance. If you know how to calculate that into anything then by all means well done.