It means that the range is so enormous that it's obvious you can find addresses/hashes 160   with matching prefixes. It occurs cause they are no unique in any way but they also doesn't mean anything.

I have an insane amount of 44 bits prefixes for 68, but decided to not share them this time to not fuel the prefix fire. On 67 people still managed to read something into the proofs I published…

There is something I don't understand.

Since the prefixes are meaningless to you, you can ignore the calculations, thoughts or ideas related to the prefixes.

Bram = Doing something that everyone can do with 2200+ GPU is not a very high-level result.

KTimesG = A person who says his concern is to gain knowledge, a person who tries to show that he is knowledgeable (AI) every time he writes an answer. Nobody knows what his purpose is here.
- You don't scan wallets.
- You defend the actions and speeches of people who find any wallet. (Do you have an interest? Are you expecting something?)
- A person who says that those who find wallets are the right people but those who can't find them are always wrong.

Wake up everyone, there are people here who only dream of doing something with CPU power. There are people who feel lucky, who are eager to achieve something, who are improving themselves.

You are making fun of the software because it scans 1m/key sec per hour.
Someone is trying to do something about their prefixes. You are making fun of them.

He is trying to calculate, think, calculate probability according to himself. You are making fun of him or saying that he is doing it wrong.

Bram, look, you said these words;
"We all have a different ability to learn understand - and those inequalities are further compounded by our socio-economic backgrounds."

Every brave man eats yogurt differently.
(Those who don't eat yogurt should go fishing.)

Good luck to everyone..

My method has nothing to do with bruteforce and I am still going to keep trying to solve,  even if its only just 1 puzzle that i manage to solve eventually, i would still be happy with that.  I will admit though that ive lost more of my motivation to try to solve now.   At the current rate though of taking about 2 months to solve every puzzle by bram,  I guess that still leaves me with a few more years of time to keep trying to solve some of the remaining puzzles that bram isnt working on yet.  I'll take those odds,  still better than nothing I guess.  Dont you all go giving him even more hints though or he might solve every remaining puzzle in just a few days.   All puzzle solvers must keep hope alive for us remaining solvers with terrible hardware.   LOL!

That's the problem here.  People count on "hopes" or "luck"... It doesn't work like that. Pure computing power is key factor here. The more gear you have the better for you.  And it's important to realize what is real and what is not -  solving a 69bit number on a single (or even few) CPU or GPU is not real (in a reasonable time) in my opinion.

I have now full-on created a bot that subscribed to your channel. A post will be made automatically on this thread if the correct address pops up. Until then, nice collection - I'll use a modified version of BSGS to reverse engineer the private key ranges of each set of addresses flowing in, wish me luck.

@bilbigin: dude, you can do whatever you want with your time, life, and resources. Yes, I'm not scanning for the address puzzles simply because the chances of success are not worth at all the time and money to waste on it. While your spreadsheet (!) suggests you where to look for the next 52-bit prefix this week, Bram already went through 80 of them, on average. By that, I mean that using MATH and PROBABILITY, I am 99.99% confident he went through at least 60 and at most 100 52-bit prefixes so far. The rest of the 0.01% chances are that he found less than 60 or more than 100.

Now, who do you think has the higher chances? The guy who finds one 52-bit prefix per day due to limited resources (limited meaning dozens of GPUs running non-stop) or the guy who eats through them like a hot knife goes through butter?

So, what are you doing?

Praising someone who is a GPU too much, (Those who found the wallet)
Preventing people's hopes, excitement, and self-development,
Saying "I'm not your teacher" when someone asks something,
I'm saying that you have a very negative personality like this.
(This is a disease.)

Don't waste your time and resources writing negative things about someone here, go fishing. lol

What are you doing here? No one has gotten the answer to this yet.

If you don't praise yourself, no one will 

You mean except for the fact that I published prefixes for 67 which actually allow you to test you theory as if you were having the same computational power and show us once and for all that the prefix method is superior ?