Said the man who has decided to ignore me... He however tried to mock me... funny.

Nobody was talking about coin network, but coin distribution and usability...and about personal issues, I won't talk about yours with anybody who is not going smoothly with your point of view. You sure have them.

Whatever I think or say, Griffith is respectable dev. And it looks Barry is trying to be fair. Why wouldn't they? To me, to anybody...
And also, you are not the only one here.

Good luck to you too. (No irony in this)

To make fun of somebody, you should have sense of humour.
Do whatever is pleasing you. 
You can even dance. 

I'm not sure why everyone seems to be unsure or abandoning ship in terms of SuperCoin (either current or future).
No exchanges/listing on Coinmarketcap is no reason to worry (literally.. at all, unless you want to cash out).
I've both a permanent Supercoin node at my place, as well as an external one that I intend to use for the chainswap; I may keep it running for as long as I can.

I'm currently investigating a very awesome possibility in terms of upgrading the codebase.

If you didn't know (or not a programmer type); there was a large rewrite of both the Bitcoin/RPC engine between versions 0.8 and 0.9 of the Bitcoin codebase (which naturally most altcoins are derived from; most of them being pre-0.8.6). The earlier codebase started to strain when supporting large wallets or large blockchains, and performance from both UI and RPC suffered as a result. This prompted a rewrite, allowing post 0.9 clones to operate very efficiently regardless of the constraints (wallet/blockchain size) they were placed under.

Someone earlier mentioned that all these changes (including the chainswap) will mean that this isn't really Supercoin anymore.
It will be like Supercoin's older brother has stepped into place; the brother who taught Supercoin how to swagger.

To those who feel it necessary to leave, it is up to you; no harm done.
To those who want to hang around but are a bit nervous, just remember.. as long as there are nodes around and you've got your wallet safe and sound; your investment has not gone anywhere.
To those who have been patiently waiting, cheers guys; grab a beer, this is a learning experience as well as a good ride.

james

I cant build wallet from: https://github.com/Greg-Griffith/SuperCoin
os ubuntu server 14.04x64

make -j 4 -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=- DEBUGFLAGS=""
...
walletdb.cpp:(.text+0x2322): undefined reference to `boost::filesystem::detail::copy_file(boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::copy_option, boost::system::error_code*)'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [SuperCoind] Error 1

any ideas?

Lets start staking some Super

✩✩ Just an alert for the Yobit Exchange. It's not possible to withdraw your Super from that Exchange so don't buy or trade there ✩✩

Hi all,

While i love shilling accounts/trolls hanging shit on supercoin (actin' like they know), it does make me think that a little progress board isnt such a bad idea. Part of the reason that this is taking a while to do, is that there are quite a few separate/large tasks to be achieved before we can even think about launching SuperCoinPlus.

I'm still working on the blockexplorer/chainswap node (nearly done), but I will try and come up with something to give a bit clearer picture on progress later today.

james

I download a new source. When i try to build a wallet i have error again

obj/walletdb.o: In function `BackupWallet(CWallet const&, std::string const&)':
walletdb.cpp:(.text+0x2322): undefined reference to `boost::filesystem::detail::copy_file(boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::copy_option, boost::system::error_code*)'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [SuperCoind] Error 1

FYI, GrinZ isn't incompetent neither a noob.

Hopefully Griffith, Barry or anyone else have the solution for the compile problem.
It's pretty important!

Thanks for the update !