You may want to read these articles about cryptsy!

1: http://themerkle.com/news/cryptsy-served-us-a-cease-and-desist-when-we-tried-warning-users-of-problems/

2: http://www.coindesk.com/digital-currency-exchange-cryptsy-ceos-wife-asset-documents/

3: https://coinreport.net/tales-from-the-cryptsy/

According to zebbra2014 request.

My analysis of SuperCoin. I do it for free (unless otherwise specified) for interesting(for me) coins.
CTransaction::FetchInputs          Good      shrmcoin             
ProcessMessage                     Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=1055, codehash=f3be8440a92c00377ab4;   Well, actually here a lot of changes related to anonymity mixer, there is nothing that looks suspicious for holders, however i cant say how its reliably for keeping anonymity, because i'm not specialist it that filed
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity     Good      shrmcoin             
SendMessages                       Good      NEBUCHADNEZZAR       
CheckProofOfWork                   Good      arch                 
GetNextTargetRequired              Most similar shrmcoin, diff=33, codehash=b7260b1f973355625d02;   Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::AcceptBlock                Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=31, codehash=7c584ef3f56569f267e1;   Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::SignBlock                  Good      shrmcoin             
GetTransaction                     Good      shrmcoin             
ComputeMinStake                    Good      arch                 
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs     Good      blackcoin arch       
ProcessBlock                       Most similar shrmcoin, diff=2, codehash=755d39d060ed2fb9c0b8;   Manually inspected, Good
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority       Good      dash blackcoin arch 
CTransaction::GetValueIn           Good      blackcoin arch       
ComputeMinWork                     Good      arch                 
CTransaction::CheckTransaction     Good      blackcoin arch       
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good      blackcoin arch       
CTransaction::ConnectInputs        Most similar arch, diff=1, codehash=8d862dbc639fa2ceaa57;   Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::CheckBlock                 Most similar shrmcoin, diff=6, codehash=e953a30a7bd9fcd67862;   Manually inspected, Good
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool      Good      shrmcoin             
CBlock::SetBestChainInner          Good      blackcoin arch       
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust         Good      blackcoin arch       
ProcessMessages                    Good      NEBUCHADNEZZAR       
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature        Good      arch                 
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor  Good      blackcoin arch       
CBlock::ConnectBlock               Most similar shrmcoin, diff=6, codehash=dc163ad32602d21c3d77;   Manually inspected, Good
Not found funcs ['AcceptToMemoryPool', 'GetProofOfStakeLimit']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good

---

What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically.  As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock                Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e'  means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.

we are waiting on the strawpoll to get enough votes to decide something

http://strawpoll.me/6889793

so there has been a good number of people that responded to the strawpoll already, i think i will give it another 24 hours before i start to change something. i am doing it based on which vote is #1 on the results page. seems like a fair enough system

You thus change only PoS, but the main question on MULTISIG do not answer!

final vote for c-cex.
https://c-cex.com/?id=vote

Reading the previous posts - the question remains open - Multisig works or does not work!

Link? In true !!! post where there are 100 %% statement about working Multisig!