I don't care about their own trading platform. I'm suggesting legal action against Cashila because they raised $10.5 million based mainly on their promise that ICN will be listed on top exchanges, but now that ICO is over, they're hiding behind NDAs, instead of being proactive to list ICN on top exchanges like they promised during ICO.

Not at all. The purpose of those app tokens is not to bring fiat investors into crypto. For them it is essential to be traded on a crypto-only exchange, since their target audience is crypto users.
Like I wrote, Iconomi has quite the opposite approach - bring the fiat investors into crypto. How many of these potential fiat investors are going to buy ICN, if it would be listed on polo and not Kraken?
Most of them don't know, and don't want to know how to buy or use bitcoin.

As for all these privacy-oriented coins - you'd be surprised how minor and insignificant the privacy niche is outside crypto community.
For 99% of people out there, the level of privacy that bitcoin provides is more than enough.

Yo Princess,

so you think the threat of "legal action" is going to make ICONOMI go, "Shit mate, this mofo's fucking serious, we better get that fucking bitch listed on Poloniex ASAP else we're gonna get fraped by lawyers.......

Mate!!!

FOOKING HELL!!!

I really wish I could fucking bitch slap you right now.

The amount of uuum, mental challenge some folks have..

Also this:

So why the fuck did you invest into this trading platform?
Did you also buy zcash, just cuz you don't care about privacy?

Exactly, polo is crypto only exchange. I don't see them adding fiat deposits anytime soon. Fiat investors can deposit fiat into kraken directly. I just want them to add usd and euro to ICN pairs

Given the amount of money raised by Cashila, attorneys can represent investors on contingency basis, in return of a certain percentage from the awarded amount.
Cashila could be liable for more than just the raised $10.5m funds if you take into account the missed gains suffered by investors while Cashila Devs are indirectly forcing their 6-months lockup period on investors.

I agree that first dividends would not be much attractive.
I'm sure Iconomi would make good profits from performance fund investment before dividends are paid up.
But they are not gonna pay back all the profits. We only a share of profits (expected around 20%)
Also, they told that they are going to pay dividends from realised profits. Lisk price has gone very down since the ico, it would have done effect on dividends.

---

Yes, icn price is determined by quality of product. But a pump of price could only be said a real pump when the trading volume is high.

read again, it's "expect" - but nice try bullshitting

Yes, and you know what... it's because the Exchanges decide if they add a Token/Coin.

@blockchainr So fuc*n bitch around at the  poloniex trollbox and not here