You were anyway. You still are. You're a fucking slave, and you're defending the overseers.
I'm not defending the EU at all, it has lots of faults, and so do its various institutions, including the ECB. But I'm also pointing out those who are really responsible for the Cypriot mess, and that's not the EU, it's the banks, the failing Cypriot oversight bodies, the Cypriot government and Cypriot voters. As Erik Voorhees puts it so nicely: democracy is the original 51% attack. Not that I know of another, more just but still viable system of government. The worst possible system except for all the others that have been tried, as Churchill is said to have put it. I'd prefer anarcho-capitalism, but I don't think it's viable, which is why we have social democracy forced upon us.
You're very close to correct, here. Let me fix the sentence.
"But I'm also pointing out those who are really responsible for the Cypriot mess, and that's not
just the EU, it's
also the banks, the failing Cypriot oversight bodies, the Cypriot government and Cypriot voters."
I
would like to point out, however, that had the EU not existed, this mess would likely not have happened in the first place.
So, why do you think that security, justice, and risk-management cannot be provided for on the open market, and must be forced upon us by a monopoly provider?