<<  >> (p.632)
    Author Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)  (Read 3839402 times)

    • hhdllhflower
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 18
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    March 08, 2017, 05:11:44 PM
     #12621
    Quote from: Claymore on March 08, 2017, 04:54:35 PM
    To all: you can see low speed at highest possible "-i" value, if so, reduce it. For example, you specify "-i 8" for 280X 3GB card, miner reduces it to "-i 7" automatically (shows "not enough GPU memory" message), but it may work much slower than "-i 6".
    So if you see that new version is slower than old version - try to reduce "-i" value a bit.
    In some cases you can increase "-i" value, for example, in my tests Nano cards work best with v12.2 using "-i 7", but for v12.3 "-i 8" is faster.

    Quote from: bmtrader on March 08, 2017, 04:27:46 PM
    @Claymore Can you make something to improve 380 series? Currently I have 210H. Too low... Thank you in advance

    Tonga is really weak for ZEC.

    why my nano can't use -i 8?

    AMD Cards available: 3
    GPU #0: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 56 compute units
    GPU #1: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
    GPU #1 recognized as Fury X/Nano
    GPU #2: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
    GPU #2 recognized as Fury X/Nano
    POOL version
    GPU #0 is going to use too high intensity (Cool, not enough GPU memory, intensity value reduced (7)
    GPU #0 algorithm ASM, intensity 7
    GPU #1 is going to use too high intensity (Cool, not enough GPU memory, intensity value reduced (7)
    GPU #1 algorithm ASM, intensity 7
    GPU #2 is going to use too high intensity (Cool, not enough GPU memory, intensity value reduced (7)
    GPU #2 algorithm ASM, intensity 7

  • IOTUSA
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 504
    Merit: 250



    View Profile
    March 08, 2017, 05:16:48 PM
     #12622
    Quote from: hhdllhflower on March 08, 2017, 05:11:44 PM
    Quote from: Claymore on March 08, 2017, 04:54:35 PM
    To all: you can see low speed at highest possible "-i" value, if so, reduce it. For example, you specify "-i 8" for 280X 3GB card, miner reduces it to "-i 7" automatically (shows "not enough GPU memory" message), but it may work much slower than "-i 6".
    So if you see that new version is slower than old version - try to reduce "-i" value a bit.
    In some cases you can increase "-i" value, for example, in my tests Nano cards work best with v12.2 using "-i 7", but for v12.3 "-i 8" is faster.

    Quote from: bmtrader on March 08, 2017, 04:27:46 PM
    @Claymore Can you make something to improve 380 series? Currently I have 210H. Too low... Thank you in advance

    Tonga is really weak for ZEC.

    why my nano can't use -i 8?

    AMD Cards available: 3
    GPU #0: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 56 compute units
    GPU #1: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
    GPU #1 recognized as Fury X/Nano
    GPU #2: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
    GPU #2 recognized as Fury X/Nano
    POOL version
    GPU #0 is going to use too high intensity (Cool, not enough GPU memory, intensity value reduced (7)
    GPU #0 algorithm ASM, intensity 7
    GPU #1 is going to use too high intensity (Cool, not enough GPU memory, intensity value reduced (7)
    GPU #1 algorithm ASM, intensity 7
    GPU #2 is going to use too high intensity (Cool, not enough GPU memory, intensity value reduced (7)
    GPU #2 algorithm ASM, intensity 7

    literally 3 posts earlier:

    To all: you can see low speed at highest possible "-i" value, if so, reduce it. For example, you specify "-i 8" for 280X 3GB card, miner reduces it to "-i 7" automatically (shows "not enough GPU memory" message), but it may work much slower than "-i 6".
    So if you see that new version is slower than old version - try to reduce "-i" value a bit.
    In some cases you can increase "-i" value, for example, in my tests Nano cards work best with v12.2 using "-i 7", but for v12.3 "-i 8" is faster.

    Also, why do the compute units differ between your cards?
    ██  TOR Integrated & No ICO/Crowdfund & Free Airdrop     ✔ FREE ONIONS EVERY WEEK!     
    DeepONION Join free AirDrop!

  • marvykkio
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 798
    Merit: 1000


    View Profile
    March 08, 2017, 05:17:30 PM
     #12623
    have you noticed a speed increase of 470/480?

  • hhdllhflower
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 18
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    March 08, 2017, 05:24:01 PM
     #12624
    Quote from: IOTUSA on March 08, 2017, 05:16:48 PM
    Quote from: hhdllhflower on March 08, 2017, 05:11:44 PM
    Quote from: Claymore on March 08, 2017, 04:54:35 PM
    To all: you can see low speed at highest possible "-i" value, if so, reduce it. For example, you specify "-i 8" for 280X 3GB card, miner reduces it to "-i 7" automatically (shows "not enough GPU memory" message), but it may work much slower than "-i 6".
    So if you see that new version is slower than old version - try to reduce "-i" value a bit.
    In some cases you can increase "-i" value, for example, in my tests Nano cards work best with v12.2 using "-i 7", but for v12.3 "-i 8" is faster.

    Quote from: bmtrader on March 08, 2017, 04:27:46 PM
    @Claymore Can you make something to improve 380 series? Currently I have 210H. Too low... Thank you in advance

    Tonga is really weak for ZEC.

    why my nano can't use -i 8?

    AMD Cards available: 3
    GPU #0: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 56 compute units
    GPU #1: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
    GPU #1 recognized as Fury X/Nano
    GPU #2: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
    GPU #2 recognized as Fury X/Nano
    POOL version
    GPU #0 is going to use too high intensity (Cool, not enough GPU memory, intensity value reduced (7)
    GPU #0 algorithm ASM, intensity 7
    GPU #1 is going to use too high intensity (Cool, not enough GPU memory, intensity value reduced (7)
    GPU #1 algorithm ASM, intensity 7
    GPU #2 is going to use too high intensity (Cool, not enough GPU memory, intensity value reduced (7)
    GPU #2 algorithm ASM, intensity 7

    literally 3 posts earlier:

    To all: you can see low speed at highest possible "-i" value, if so, reduce it. For example, you specify "-i 8" for 280X 3GB card, miner reduces it to "-i 7" automatically (shows "not enough GPU memory" message), but it may work much slower than "-i 6".
    So if you see that new version is slower than old version - try to reduce "-i" value a bit.
    In some cases you can increase "-i" value, for example, in my tests Nano cards work best with v12.2 using "-i 7", but for v12.3 "-i 8" is faster.

    Also, why do the compute units differ between your cards?

    ZEC: GPU0 455.346 H/s, GPU1 481.857 H/s, GPU2 460.153 H/s
    v12.3 -i 7
    gpu0 is fury
    gpu1 is fury x
    gpu2 is nano
    for v12.2 can't use -i 7 , for v.12.3 i can use -i 7 but can't -i 8

  • IOTUSA
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 504
    Merit: 250



    View Profile
    March 08, 2017, 05:26:54 PM
     #12625
    Quote from: hhdllhflower on March 08, 2017, 05:24:01 PM
    Quote from: IOTUSA on March 08, 2017, 05:16:48 PM
    Quote from: hhdllhflower on March 08, 2017, 05:11:44 PM
    Quote from: Claymore on March 08, 2017, 04:54:35 PM
    To all: you can see low speed at highest possible "-i" value, if so, reduce it. For example, you specify "-i 8" for 280X 3GB card, miner reduces it to "-i 7" automatically (shows "not enough GPU memory" message), but it may work much slower than "-i 6".
    So if you see that new version is slower than old version - try to reduce "-i" value a bit.
    In some cases you can increase "-i" value, for example, in my tests Nano cards work best with v12.2 using "-i 7", but for v12.3 "-i 8" is faster.

    Quote from: bmtrader on March 08, 2017, 04:27:46 PM
    @Claymore Can you make something to improve 380 series? Currently I have 210H. Too low... Thank you in advance

    Tonga is really weak for ZEC.

    why my nano can't use -i 8?

    AMD Cards available: 3
    GPU #0: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 56 compute units
    GPU #1: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
    GPU #1 recognized as Fury X/Nano
    GPU #2: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
    GPU #2 recognized as Fury X/Nano
    POOL version
    GPU #0 is going to use too high intensity (Cool, not enough GPU memory, intensity value reduced (7)
    GPU #0 algorithm ASM, intensity 7
    GPU #1 is going to use too high intensity (Cool, not enough GPU memory, intensity value reduced (7)
    GPU #1 algorithm ASM, intensity 7
    GPU #2 is going to use too high intensity (Cool, not enough GPU memory, intensity value reduced (7)
    GPU #2 algorithm ASM, intensity 7

    literally 3 posts earlier:

    To all: you can see low speed at highest possible "-i" value, if so, reduce it. For example, you specify "-i 8" for 280X 3GB card, miner reduces it to "-i 7" automatically (shows "not enough GPU memory" message), but it may work much slower than "-i 6".
    So if you see that new version is slower than old version - try to reduce "-i" value a bit.
    In some cases you can increase "-i" value, for example, in my tests Nano cards work best with v12.2 using "-i 7", but for v12.3 "-i 8" is faster.

    Also, why do the compute units differ between your cards?

    ZEC: GPU0 455.346 H/s, GPU1 481.857 H/s, GPU2 460.153 H/s
    v12.3 -i 7
    gpu0 is fury
    gpu1 is fury x
    gpu2 is nano
    for v12.2 can't use -i 7 , for v.12.3 i can use -i 7 but can't -i 8

    I think that's pretty normal, my Fury default to i6 and I see the same ballpark speed. Honestly doesn't even change if I force it to i5 or i4
    ██  TOR Integrated & No ICO/Crowdfund & Free Airdrop     ✔ FREE ONIONS EVERY WEEK!     
    DeepONION Join free AirDrop!

  • Claymore (OP)
    Donator
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1610
    Merit: 1325

    Miners developer


    View Profile
    March 08, 2017, 05:31:48 PM
     #12626
    Quote from: hhdllhflower on March 08, 2017, 05:11:44 PM
    Quote from: Claymore on March 08, 2017, 04:54:35 PM
    To all: you can see low speed at highest possible "-i" value, if so, reduce it. For example, you specify "-i 8" for 280X 3GB card, miner reduces it to "-i 7" automatically (shows "not enough GPU memory" message), but it may work much slower than "-i 6".
    So if you see that new version is slower than old version - try to reduce "-i" value a bit.
    In some cases you can increase "-i" value, for example, in my tests Nano cards work best with v12.2 using "-i 7", but for v12.3 "-i 8" is faster.

    Quote from: bmtrader on March 08, 2017, 04:27:46 PM
    @Claymore Can you make something to improve 380 series? Currently I have 210H. Too low... Thank you in advance

    Tonga is really weak for ZEC.

    why my nano can't use -i 8?

    AMD Cards available: 3
    GPU #0: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 56 compute units
    GPU #1: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
    GPU #1 recognized as Fury X/Nano
    GPU #2: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
    GPU #2 recognized as Fury X/Nano
    POOL version
    GPU #0 is going to use too high intensity (Cool, not enough GPU memory, intensity value reduced (7)
    GPU #0 algorithm ASM, intensity 7
    GPU #1 is going to use too high intensity (Cool, not enough GPU memory, intensity value reduced (7)
    GPU #1 algorithm ASM, intensity 7
    GPU #2 is going to use too high intensity (Cool, not enough GPU memory, intensity value reduced (7)
    GPU #2 algorithm ASM, intensity 7

    Make sure you set these env variables:

    GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
    GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
    GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
    Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
    List of my miners: https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/3019607

  • Orielres
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 61
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    March 08, 2017, 05:32:33 PM
     #12627
    Quote from: IOTUSA on March 08, 2017, 05:26:54 PM
    Quote from: hhdllhflower on March 08, 2017, 05:24:01 PM
    Quote from: IOTUSA on March 08, 2017, 05:16:48 PM
    Quote from: hhdllhflower on March 08, 2017, 05:11:44 PM
    Quote from: Claymore on March 08, 2017, 04:54:35 PM
    To all: you can see low speed at highest possible "-i" value, if so, reduce it. For example, you specify "-i 8" for 280X 3GB card, miner reduces it to "-i 7" automatically (shows "not enough GPU memory" message), but it may work much slower than "-i 6".
    So if you see that new version is slower than old version - try to reduce "-i" value a bit.
    In some cases you can increase "-i" value, for example, in my tests Nano cards work best with v12.2 using "-i 7", but for v12.3 "-i 8" is faster.

    Quote from: bmtrader on March 08, 2017, 04:27:46 PM
    @Claymore Can you make something to improve 380 series? Currently I have 210H. Too low... Thank you in advance

    Tonga is really weak for ZEC.

    why my nano can't use -i 8?

    AMD Cards available: 3
    GPU #0: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 56 compute units
    GPU #1: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
    GPU #1 recognized as Fury X/Nano
    GPU #2: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
    GPU #2 recognized as Fury X/Nano
    POOL version
    GPU #0 is going to use too high intensity (Cool, not enough GPU memory, intensity value reduced (7)
    GPU #0 algorithm ASM, intensity 7
    GPU #1 is going to use too high intensity (Cool, not enough GPU memory, intensity value reduced (7)
    GPU #1 algorithm ASM, intensity 7
    GPU #2 is going to use too high intensity (Cool, not enough GPU memory, intensity value reduced (7)
    GPU #2 algorithm ASM, intensity 7

    literally 3 posts earlier:

    To all: you can see low speed at highest possible "-i" value, if so, reduce it. For example, you specify "-i 8" for 280X 3GB card, miner reduces it to "-i 7" automatically (shows "not enough GPU memory" message), but it may work much slower than "-i 6".
    So if you see that new version is slower than old version - try to reduce "-i" value a bit.
    In some cases you can increase "-i" value, for example, in my tests Nano cards work best with v12.2 using "-i 7", but for v12.3 "-i 8" is faster.

    Also, why do the compute units differ between your cards?

    ZEC: GPU0 455.346 H/s, GPU1 481.857 H/s, GPU2 460.153 H/s
    v12.3 -i 7
    gpu0 is fury
    gpu1 is fury x
    gpu2 is nano
    for v12.2 can't use -i 7 , for v.12.3 i can use -i 7 but can't -i 8

    I think that's pretty normal, my Fury default to i6 and I see the same ballpark speed. Honestly doesn't even change if I force it to i5 or i4

    That is right. My R9 Nano run better on -i 7 in 12.3 and -i 6 in 12.2.

  • Mr.Coinzer
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 420
    Merit: 267



    View Profile
    March 08, 2017, 05:36:39 PM
     #12628
    how can set mining intensity for r9295x2

  • hhdllhflower
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 18
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    March 08, 2017, 05:48:39 PM
     #12629
    Quote from: Claymore on March 08, 2017, 05:31:48 PM
    Quote from: hhdllhflower on March 08, 2017, 05:11:44 PM
    Quote from: Claymore on March 08, 2017, 04:54:35 PM
    To all: you can see low speed at highest possible "-i" value, if so, reduce it. For example, you specify "-i 8" for 280X 3GB card, miner reduces it to "-i 7" automatically (shows "not enough GPU memory" message), but it may work much slower than "-i 6".
    So if you see that new version is slower than old version - try to reduce "-i" value a bit.
    In some cases you can increase "-i" value, for example, in my tests Nano cards work best with v12.2 using "-i 7", but for v12.3 "-i 8" is faster.

    Quote from: bmtrader on March 08, 2017, 04:27:46 PM
    @Claymore Can you make something to improve 380 series? Currently I have 210H. Too low... Thank you in advance

    Tonga is really weak for ZEC.

    why my nano can't use -i 8?

    AMD Cards available: 3
    GPU #0: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 56 compute units
    GPU #1: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
    GPU #1 recognized as Fury X/Nano
    GPU #2: Fiji, 4096 MB available, 64 compute units
    GPU #2 recognized as Fury X/Nano
    POOL version
    GPU #0 is going to use too high intensity (Cool, not enough GPU memory, intensity value reduced (7)
    GPU #0 algorithm ASM, intensity 7
    GPU #1 is going to use too high intensity (Cool, not enough GPU memory, intensity value reduced (7)
    GPU #1 algorithm ASM, intensity 7
    GPU #2 is going to use too high intensity (Cool, not enough GPU memory, intensity value reduced (7)
    GPU #2 algorithm ASM, intensity 7

    Make sure you set these env variables:

    GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
    GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
    GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

    thanks it work but i get more speed on i7 Grin

  • rpg
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 728
    Merit: 500



    View Profile
    March 08, 2017, 06:11:05 PM
     #12630
    Quote from: Visbay on March 08, 2017, 08:51:57 AM
    Quote from: shadabahmed on March 08, 2017, 07:54:12 AM
    Quote from: prichina on March 08, 2017, 01:01:26 AM
    dwarwpool is so fast, lets make it great pool, it needs more workers. It does not need ssl/tlc connection btw...you dont need to worry about 2.5 dev fee

    dwarfpool is a thief.

    flypool is doing good job now a days

    Maybe the variation in Dwarfpool is too high as it has fewer users.

    Supernova has issues paying and are not replying to emails

  • rpg
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 728
    Merit: 500



    View Profile
    March 08, 2017, 06:45:35 PM
     #12631
    Gigabyte 7950 hashing at 317. A 3% improvement. The best $50 I ever invested lol
    Gigabyte g1 rx480 heading at 335

    Will later test the others

  • suggsy89
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 142
    Merit: 100


    View Profile
    March 08, 2017, 07:24:09 PM
     #12632
    Quote from: marvykkio on March 08, 2017, 05:17:30 PM
    have you noticed a speed increase of 470/480?

    No hash-rate increase for RX480, adjusting intensity settings does nothing for speed.

    I think in general just bug fixes for this release.

  • Swiped
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 100
    Merit: 10


    View Profile
    March 08, 2017, 07:36:36 PM
     #12633
    Quote from: IOTUSA on March 08, 2017, 03:01:20 PM
    Quote from: pelebel on March 08, 2017, 02:59:27 PM
    Make sure your AMD Gaming Evolve app didn't automatically update your drivers, I had to use DDU and reinstall 4 times until I figured out it does that EVEN IF you uncheck the box during installation. You have to manually open AMD Gaming Evolved, click on the wheel besides deriver update and uncheck auto updates.

    That's not it. And this is a 100% clean and updated Windows 10 x64 install with 4GB ram, 20 GB virtual mem, and NOTHING but AMD 16.3 drivers and claymore installed. Blows my damn mind.

    General behavior is:

    1. A card (random) will hash at 0% while all others are fine
    2. OpenCL call hangs.
    3. Crash

    Sometimes all cards will be hashing just dandy for a minute or two, then one drops, then OpenCL call fail on 1 card.

    Experience has shown me that the OpenCL hang for any of my rigs (I am small time with 16 rigs) is that it is one of three things:

    1. Video drivers need to be re-installed.  I have been using 16.11.5 for all my rigs for several months now without issue, or at least with the least number of issues.  Install it with only one card connected to the motherboard, and then add the other cards and let them auto-populate/auto-install.  This is probably 50% of my issues.
    2.  I run a mod'd bios on all my cards that I make that uses the #5 voltage strap across #6 and #7 straps and runs the mem speed at 1750 Mhz.  Sometimes this causes the voltage to be too low on the #7 strap and I have to raise that voltage up in 20 mV steps until I get it stable, and then I will flash the bios with that change, or you can use WattTool or whatever you have to make that change.  None of the cards are exactly the same due to variations in manufacturing even though they are all the same make and model, so getting the voltage right is key.  This is probably 40% of my issues.
    3.  Bad riser cards or bad riser cables, or a bad connection to the motherboard.  This has only happened twice in 6 months, but it is a possible contributor on a less frequent case.

    A few times I have had to do a complete Windows 10 clean install, but I have come to realize that most of the issues are really video drivers and undervolting the GPU core clock.  Hope this helps.

  • marcos5872
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 107
    Merit: 10


    View Profile
    March 08, 2017, 07:40:56 PM
     #12634
    Quote from: IOTUSA on March 08, 2017, 03:01:20 PM
    Quote from: pelebel on March 08, 2017, 02:59:27 PM
    Make sure your AMD Gaming Evolve app didn't automatically update your drivers, I had to use DDU and reinstall 4 times until I figured out it does that EVEN IF you uncheck the box during installation. You have to manually open AMD Gaming Evolved, click on the wheel besides deriver update and uncheck auto updates.

    That's not it. And this is a 100% clean and updated Windows 10 x64 install with 4GB ram, 20 GB virtual mem, and NOTHING but AMD 16.3 drivers and claymore installed. Blows my damn mind.

    General behavior is:

    1. A card (random) will hash at 0% while all others are fine
    2. OpenCL call hangs.
    3. Crash

    Sometimes all cards will be hashing just dandy for a minute or two, then one drops, then OpenCL call fail on 1 card.

    Hello, I has the same problem wit my R9 280x and R 390, always one GPU shows at 0% and OpenCL call hangs. Did you found a solution?

  • IOTUSA
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 504
    Merit: 250



    View Profile
    March 08, 2017, 07:55:47 PM
     #12635
    Quote from: Swiped on March 08, 2017, 07:36:36 PM
    Quote from: IOTUSA on March 08, 2017, 03:01:20 PM
    Quote from: pelebel on March 08, 2017, 02:59:27 PM
    Make sure your AMD Gaming Evolve app didn't automatically update your drivers, I had to use DDU and reinstall 4 times until I figured out it does that EVEN IF you uncheck the box during installation. You have to manually open AMD Gaming Evolved, click on the wheel besides deriver update and uncheck auto updates.

    That's not it. And this is a 100% clean and updated Windows 10 x64 install with 4GB ram, 20 GB virtual mem, and NOTHING but AMD 16.3 drivers and claymore installed. Blows my damn mind.

    General behavior is:

    1. A card (random) will hash at 0% while all others are fine
    2. OpenCL call hangs.
    3. Crash

    Sometimes all cards will be hashing just dandy for a minute or two, then one drops, then OpenCL call fail on 1 card.

    Experience has shown me that the OpenCL hang for any of my rigs (I am small time with 16 rigs) is that it is one of three things:

    1. Video drivers need to be re-installed.  I have been using 16.11.5 for all my rigs for several months now without issue, or at least with the least number of issues.  Install it with only one card connected to the motherboard, and then add the other cards and let them auto-populate/auto-install.  This is probably 50% of my issues.
    2.  I run a mod'd bios on all my cards that I make that uses the #5 voltage strap across #6 and #7 straps and runs the mem speed at 1750 Mhz.  Sometimes this causes the voltage to be too low on the #7 strap and I have to raise that voltage up in 20 mV steps until I get it stable, and then I will flash the bios with that change, or you can use WattTool or whatever you have to make that change.  None of the cards are exactly the same due to variations in manufacturing even though they are all the same make and model, so getting the voltage right is key.  This is probably 40% of my issues.
    3.  Bad riser cards or bad riser cables, or a bad connection to the motherboard.  This has only happened twice in 6 months, but it is a possible contributor on a less frequent case.

    A few times I have had to do a complete Windows 10 clean install, but I have come to realize that most of the issues are really video drivers and undervolting the GPU core clock.  Hope this helps.

    My cards are BIOS modded slightly for power draw. Maybe I'll start with dropping the mem/core speed some and see if that solves the issue. Thank you.
    ██  TOR Integrated & No ICO/Crowdfund & Free Airdrop     ✔ FREE ONIONS EVERY WEEK!     
    DeepONION Join free AirDrop!

  • IOTUSA
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 504
    Merit: 250



    View Profile
    March 08, 2017, 08:08:56 PM
     #12636
    Quote from: marcos5872 on March 08, 2017, 07:40:56 PM
    Quote from: IOTUSA on March 08, 2017, 03:01:20 PM
    Quote from: pelebel on March 08, 2017, 02:59:27 PM
    Make sure your AMD Gaming Evolve app didn't automatically update your drivers, I had to use DDU and reinstall 4 times until I figured out it does that EVEN IF you uncheck the box during installation. You have to manually open AMD Gaming Evolved, click on the wheel besides deriver update and uncheck auto updates.

    That's not it. And this is a 100% clean and updated Windows 10 x64 install with 4GB ram, 20 GB virtual mem, and NOTHING but AMD 16.3 drivers and claymore installed. Blows my damn mind.

    General behavior is:

    1. A card (random) will hash at 0% while all others are fine
    2. OpenCL call hangs.
    3. Crash

    Sometimes all cards will be hashing just dandy for a minute or two, then one drops, then OpenCL call fail on 1 card.

    Hello, I has the same problem wit my R9 280x and R 390, always one GPU shows at 0% and OpenCL call hangs. Did you found a solution?

    Nothing solid yet. I am wildly speculating it might be power draw. What PSU do you use? Setup?
    ██  TOR Integrated & No ICO/Crowdfund & Free Airdrop     ✔ FREE ONIONS EVERY WEEK!     
    DeepONION Join free AirDrop!

  • br2459
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 269
    Merit: 102


    View Profile
    March 08, 2017, 08:16:42 PM
     #12637
    Anyone have a BIOS mod for a XFX r9 280x Black Edition with Elpida Memory?
    |## MINERSTAT.COM ##|
    |## Save     on time without losing the profits ##|

  • marcos5872
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 107
    Merit: 10


    View Profile
    March 08, 2017, 08:28:27 PM
     #12638
    Quote from: IOTUSA on March 08, 2017, 08:08:56 PM
    Quote from: marcos5872 on March 08, 2017, 07:40:56 PM
    Quote from: IOTUSA on March 08, 2017, 03:01:20 PM
    Quote from: pelebel on March 08, 2017, 02:59:27 PM
    Make sure your AMD Gaming Evolve app didn't automatically update your drivers, I had to use DDU and reinstall 4 times until I figured out it does that EVEN IF you uncheck the box during installation. You have to manually open AMD Gaming Evolved, click on the wheel besides deriver update and uncheck auto updates.

    That's not it. And this is a 100% clean and updated Windows 10 x64 install with 4GB ram, 20 GB virtual mem, and NOTHING but AMD 16.3 drivers and claymore installed. Blows my damn mind.

    General behavior is:

    1. A card (random) will hash at 0% while all others are fine
    2. OpenCL call hangs.
    3. Crash

    Sometimes all cards will be hashing just dandy for a minute or two, then one drops, then OpenCL call fail on 1 card.

    Hello, I has the same problem wit my R9 280x and R 390, always one GPU shows at 0% and OpenCL call hangs. Did you found a solution?

    Nothing solid yet. I am wildly speculating it might be power draw. What PSU do you use? Setup?

    Actually I have only 2 R9 280x with PSU EVGA 1300w tow both on stock settings, One r9 390 move to another rig and works fine, I'm thinking the problem is the Mobo.

    With Otiminer one R9 280x Drops hash but not crash.

  • IOTUSA
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 504
    Merit: 250



    View Profile
    March 08, 2017, 08:44:12 PM
     #12639
    Quote from: marcos5872 on March 08, 2017, 08:28:27 PM
    Quote from: IOTUSA on March 08, 2017, 08:08:56 PM
    Quote from: marcos5872 on March 08, 2017, 07:40:56 PM
    Quote from: IOTUSA on March 08, 2017, 03:01:20 PM
    Quote from: pelebel on March 08, 2017, 02:59:27 PM
    Make sure your AMD Gaming Evolve app didn't automatically update your drivers, I had to use DDU and reinstall 4 times until I figured out it does that EVEN IF you uncheck the box during installation. You have to manually open AMD Gaming Evolved, click on the wheel besides deriver update and uncheck auto updates.

    That's not it. And this is a 100% clean and updated Windows 10 x64 install with 4GB ram, 20 GB virtual mem, and NOTHING but AMD 16.3 drivers and claymore installed. Blows my damn mind.

    General behavior is:

    1. A card (random) will hash at 0% while all others are fine
    2. OpenCL call hangs.
    3. Crash

    Sometimes all cards will be hashing just dandy for a minute or two, then one drops, then OpenCL call fail on 1 card.

    Hello, I has the same problem wit my R9 280x and R 390, always one GPU shows at 0% and OpenCL call hangs. Did you found a solution?

    Nothing solid yet. I am wildly speculating it might be power draw. What PSU do you use? Setup?

    Actually I have only 2 R9 280x with PSU EVGA 1300w tow both on stock settings, One r9 390 move to another rig and works fine, I'm thinking the problem is the Mobo.

    With Otiminer one R9 280x Drops hash but not crash.

    I might try a new MB as well. I can't for the damn life of me figure it out. I run 6 x 480 on a single 1300w but they are Bios modded (Eco mod) so that shouldn't be an issue.

    I'll swap MB and report back.
    ██  TOR Integrated & No ICO/Crowdfund & Free Airdrop     ✔ FREE ONIONS EVERY WEEK!     
    DeepONION Join free AirDrop!

  • ocminer
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 2772
    Merit: 1245



    View Profile WWW
    March 08, 2017, 09:00:33 PM
     #12640
    Quote from: rpg on March 08, 2017, 06:11:05 PM
    Quote from: Visbay on March 08, 2017, 08:51:57 AM
    Quote from: shadabahmed on March 08, 2017, 07:54:12 AM
    Quote from: prichina on March 08, 2017, 01:01:26 AM
    dwarwpool is so fast, lets make it great pool, it needs more workers. It does not need ssl/tlc connection btw...you dont need to worry about 2.5 dev fee

    dwarfpool is a thief.

    flypool is doing good job now a days

    Maybe the variation in Dwarfpool is too high as it has fewer users.

    Supernova has issues paying and are not replying to emails

    Never had any issues paying and my inbox is empty Smiley
    suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet
    https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
    Pages: « 1 ... 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 [632] 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 ... 759 »
      Print  
Page 631
Viewing Page: 632

IRLBTC™ © 2025 IRLBTC.com