<<  >> (p.649)
    Author Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)  (Read 3839402 times)

    • br2459
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 269
    Merit: 102


    View Profile
    March 21, 2017, 06:00:25 PM
     #12961
    Quote from: Nauticalam on March 21, 2017, 05:33:12 PM
    Quote from: br2459 on March 21, 2017, 03:30:37 PM
    Quote from: yellowtie on March 20, 2017, 07:55:50 PM
    Hi!
    Ive just created table with hashrate and power consumption for most popular amd videocards, please help me fix it.
    PM me or write here if have another value(s) for any card.

    Code:
    Model                 Sol/sec   Power 
    ----------------------------------------
     7950                  285       160   
     7970M 2GB             145       100
     7970                  292       270   
     R9 270                180       180   
     R9 280                280       300
     R9 280x               310       300   
     R9 290                340       250   
     R9 290 flash to 390   370       250   
     R9 380                230       200   
     R9 390                411       250   
     R9 390x               410       280   
     RX 460                150        60
     RX 470 4Gb            299       150   
     RX 480                300       150   
     R9 Fury Nano          450       185   
     R9 Fury X             455       225   
     R9 Fury Nitro         470       250   
    My 7970 with Hynix Mem is running about 313H/s but about 225W. Its a modified BIOS but no custom straps.

    What do you mean "a modified BIOS but no custom straps."?

    I just grabbed a BIOS that would allow me to OC the card past the default max, which was something like 1525MHz on the Memclock. Now I can OC up to 2000MHz on the memclock. I believe this is the BIOS I grabbed for it: https://www.techpowerup.com/vgabios/123523/sapphire-hd7970-3072-120628

    It's a Sapphire 7970 non-ghz edition. But I think I flashed it with the Vapor-X bios. Its been running solid for about a month now.
    |## MINERSTAT.COM ##|
    |## Save     on time without losing the profits ##|

  • Rusmintan
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 19
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    March 21, 2017, 06:20:39 PM
     #12962
    Quote from: br2459 on March 21, 2017, 06:00:25 PM
    Quote from: Nauticalam on March 21, 2017, 05:33:12 PM
    Quote from: br2459 on March 21, 2017, 03:30:37 PM
    Quote from: yellowtie on March 20, 2017, 07:55:50 PM
    Hi!
    Ive just created table with hashrate and power consumption for most popular amd videocards, please help me fix it.
    PM me or write here if have another value(s) for any card.

    Code:
    Model                 Sol/sec   Power 
    ----------------------------------------
     7950                  285       160   
     7970M 2GB             145       100
     7970                  292       270   
     R9 270                180       180   
     R9 280                280       300
     R9 280x               310       300   
     R9 290                340       250   
     R9 290 flash to 390   370       250   
     R9 380                230       200   
     R9 390                411       250   
     R9 390x               410       280   
     RX 460                150        60
     RX 470 4Gb            299       150   
     RX 480                300       150   
     R9 Fury Nano          450       185   
     R9 Fury X             455       225   
     R9 Fury Nitro         470       250   
    My 7970 with Hynix Mem is running about 313H/s but about 225W. Its a modified BIOS but no custom straps.

    What do you mean "a modified BIOS but no custom straps."?

    I just grabbed a BIOS that would allow me to OC the card past the default max, which was something like 1525MHz on the Memclock. Now I can OC up to 2000MHz on the memclock. I believe this is the BIOS I grabbed for it: https://www.techpowerup.com/vgabios/123523/sapphire-hd7970-3072-120628

    It's a Sapphire 7970 non-ghz edition. But I think I flashed it with the Vapor-X bios. Its been running solid for about a month now.

    It seems that the memory strip mod for the ZEC mining is not so necessary. For ETH, it is more important.

  • carlo_0000
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1281
    Merit: 1003


    View Profile
    March 21, 2017, 06:22:10 PM
     #12963
    Quote
    R9 270                180       180

    180w for r9 270  i don't think so it s an 150w gpu so it s more close to 100-110 probably

    and 380 it s vary a lot with model and ram, the worse i have is asus 380 4G  it does only 206mh

  • silentrunner
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 52
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    March 21, 2017, 06:58:13 PM
     #12964
    Quote from: carlo_0000 on March 21, 2017, 06:22:10 PM
    Quote
    R9 270                180       180

    180w for r9 270  i don't think so it s an 150w gpu so it s more close to 100-110 probably

    and 380 it s vary a lot with model and ram, the worse i have is asus 380 4G  it does only 206mh

    I am getting about the same for Gigabyte R9 270 running 12.4.
    Average of 4 cards (2 under win, 2 under linux)
    H/s: 175
    watt: 115-120

  • streetworker
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 9
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    March 21, 2017, 09:14:37 PM
     #12965
    12.4, Win 10, driver 15.12

    Sapphire R9 280 Dual X @ stock bios, 1100/1500, i:5, asm: 1 ~295H/s@ ~200W
    Sapphire R9 290 reference @ 390 bios, 1100/1250, i:6, asm: 1 ~400H/s@ ~260W

  • Socket54
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 148
    Merit: 102



    View Profile
    March 21, 2017, 09:15:55 PM
     #12966
    Quote from: yellowtie on March 20, 2017, 07:55:50 PM
    Hi!
    Ive just created table with hashrate and power consumption for most popular amd videocards, please help me fix it.
    PM me or write here if have another value(s) for any card.

    Code:
    Model                 Sol/sec   Power  
    ----------------------------------------
     7950                  285       160    
     7970M 2GB             145       100
     7970                  300       215
     7990                  600       375      
     R9 270                180       180    
     R9 280                280       200
     R9 280x               310       230    
     R9 290                340       250    
     R9 290 flash to 390   370       250    
     R9 380                230       200    
     R9 390                411       250    
     R9 390x               410       280    
     RX 460                150        60
     RX 470 4Gb            299       150    
     RX 480                300       150    
     R9 Fury Nano          450       185    
     R9 Fury X             455       225    
     R9 Fury Nitro         470       250    

    Stock RX 480's are getting about 295-305 on my machine. No custom rom, reference XFX models 8GB. Windows 10 pro anni. edition using recommended driver for the claymore equihash miner.
    Laugh Smile and Love

  • haxiboy
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 36
    Merit: 0


    View Profile WWW
    March 21, 2017, 10:24:31 PM
     #12967
    Quote from: Socket54 on March 21, 2017, 09:15:55 PM
    Quote from: yellowtie on March 20, 2017, 07:55:50 PM
    Hi!
    Ive just created table with hashrate and power consumption for most popular amd videocards, please help me fix it.
    PM me or write here if have another value(s) for any card.

    Code:
    Model                 Sol/sec   Power  
    ----------------------------------------
     7950                  285       160    
     7970M 2GB             145       100
     7970                  300       215
     7990                  600       375      
     R9 270                180       180    
     R9 280                280       200
     R9 280x               310       230    
     R9 290                340       250    
     R9 290 flash to 390   370       250    
     R9 380                230       200    
     R9 390                411       250    
     R9 390x               410       280    
     RX 460                150        60
     RX 470 4Gb            299       150    
     RX 480                300       150    
     R9 Fury Nano          450       185    
     R9 Fury X             455       225    
     R9 Fury Nitro         470       250    

    Stock RX 480's are getting about 295-305 on my machine. No custom rom, reference XFX models 8GB. Windows 10 pro anni. edition using recommended driver for the claymore equihash miner.

    My RX 480 4G nitro + with some OC 1435 2100 330 sol.

  • carlo_0000
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1281
    Merit: 1003


    View Profile
    March 21, 2017, 11:36:09 PM
     #12968
    Quote from: silentrunner on March 21, 2017, 06:58:13 PM
    Quote from: carlo_0000 on March 21, 2017, 06:22:10 PM
    Quote
    R9 270                180       180

    180w for r9 270  i don't think so it s an 150w gpu so it s more close to 100-110 probably

    and 380 it s vary a lot with model and ram, the worse i have is asus 380 4G  it does only 206mh

    I am getting about the same for Gigabyte R9 270 running 12.4.
    Average of 4 cards (2 under win, 2 under linux)
    H/s: 175
    watt: 115-120

    you using 12.4?  no speed decrease ?
    because i tested and 12.4 (172) is slower than 12.1 (179)

  • Toninho
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 597
    Merit: 500


    View Profile
    March 22, 2017, 12:50:31 AM
     #12969
    Quote from: yellowtie on March 20, 2017, 07:55:50 PM
    Hi!
    Ive just created table with hashrate and power consumption for most popular amd videocards, please help me fix it.
    PM me or write here if have another value(s) for any card.

    Code:
    Model                 Sol/sec   Power  
    ----------------------------------------
     7950                  285       160    
     7970M 2GB             145       100
     7970                  300       215
     7990                  600       375      
     R9 270                180       180    
     R9 280                280       200
     R9 280x               310       230    
     R9 290                340       250    
     R9 290 flash to 390   370       250    
     R9 380                230       200    
     R9 390                411       250    
     R9 390x               410       280    
     RX 460                150        60
     RX 470 4Gb            299       150    
     RX 480                300       150    
     R9 Fury Nano          450       185    
     R9 Fury X             455       225    
     R9 Fury Nitro         470       250    
    Being thus the most profitable in relation to price and watts is RX 470 4Gb ?

  • streetworker
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 9
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    March 22, 2017, 01:21:34 AM
     #12970
    I made a list from the beginning of this thread till now. I collected everything depending on GPU type, H/s and W. Almost all listed cards have modded bios or clocked to best Hash/Watt ratio.
    I hope I got everything right and of course everybody is telling the truth Wink

    listed in order of efficiency:

    7950/280      290-300H/s @ 200W
    7970/280X    300-310H/s @ 210W
    290/390       395-400H/s @ 260W
    290X/390X    400-410H/s @ 260W
    Fury/FuryX   450-460H/s @ 275W
    RX 470        290-300H/s @ 110W
    RX 480        300-310H/s @ 90W
    Nano           450-460H/s @ 175W

  • citronick
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1834
    Merit: 1080


    ---- winter*juvia -----


    View Profile
    March 22, 2017, 01:42:59 AM
     #12971
    Quote from: streetworker on March 22, 2017, 01:21:34 AM
    I made a list from the beginning of this thread till now. I collected everything depending on GPU type, H/s and W. Almost all listed cards have modded bios or clocked to best Hash/Watt ratio.
    I hope I got everything right and of course everybody is telling the truth Wink

    listed in order of efficiency:

    7950/280      290-300H/s @ 200W
    7970/280X    300-310H/s @ 210W
    290/390       395-400H/s @ 260W
    290X/390X    400-410H/s @ 260W
    Fury/FuryX   450-460H/s @ 275W
    RX 470        290-300H/s @ 110W
    RX 480        300-310H/s @ 90W
    Nano           450-460H/s @ 175W


    While Claymore performs best on Windows - the other miner performs best and stable on Linux .....  I was on Windows before but now on Linux and I ain't going back!  Grin
    If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...

  • snakey
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1386
    Merit: 1001



    View Profile
    March 22, 2017, 03:40:08 AM
     #12972
    Hi guys, would appreciate a little help please.

    I remember the early claymore versions were using a lot of cpu power....Just wanted to know if the latest version is using much of the cpu because I want to use a celeron cpu..

    Can anyone please confirm that celeron cpus are ok and if yes which ones are ok for 1150?

    Also is 4gb ram enough?

    Thank you.

  • rpg
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 728
    Merit: 500



    View Profile
    March 22, 2017, 03:50:39 AM
     #12973
    Quote from: snakey on March 22, 2017, 03:40:08 AM
    Hi guys, would appreciate a little help please.

    I remember the early claymore versions were using a lot of cpu power....Just wanted to know if the latest version is using much of the cpu because I want to use a celeron cpu..

    Can anyone please confirm that celeron cpus are ok and if yes which ones are ok for 1150?

    Also is 4gb ram enough?

    Thank you.

    Running 2 mobos one with a 1156 i3 and the other with a 1150 celoron. Both with 4 gigs of memory. On the 1150 uses 5% of CPU with 200 meg pages and 3 gig free phisical memory. All under win7, one home the other pro

  • snakey
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1386
    Merit: 1001



    View Profile
    March 22, 2017, 04:09:48 AM
     #12974
    Quote from: rpg on March 22, 2017, 03:50:39 AM
    Quote from: snakey on March 22, 2017, 03:40:08 AM
    Hi guys, would appreciate a little help please.

    I remember the early claymore versions were using a lot of cpu power....Just wanted to know if the latest version is using much of the cpu because I want to use a celeron cpu..

    Can anyone please confirm that celeron cpus are ok and if yes which ones are ok for 1150?

    Also is 4gb ram enough?

    Thank you.

    Running 2 mobos one with a 1156 i3 and the other with a 1150 celoron. Both with 4 gigs of memory. On the 1150 uses 5% of CPU with 200 meg pages and 3 gig free phisical memory. All under win7, one home the other pro

    Thanks so much for the info.....So basically the same..

    Does not affect the speed of your GPUs?

    What model celeron please?

  • QuintLeo
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1498
    Merit: 1030


    View Profile
    March 22, 2017, 04:42:28 AM
     #12975
    For reference, my "big rig" triple R9 290 rig uses a Sempron 145 (single-core) CPU.
    It sees the same hashrate per card on ETH/ZEC as my dual-290 rig that has a A10 7860K quad-core CPU.

     Neither ETH nor ZEC uses a lot of CPU (unless you're running an ETH older miner that generates the DAG file on the CPU, but even there it's interleaving that usage where it doesn't slow you down after the first startup).


     Folding, on the other hand, needs substantial CPU support.
    I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
    Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
    1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)

  • QuintLeo
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1498
    Merit: 1030


    View Profile
    March 22, 2017, 04:44:25 AM
     #12976
    Quote from: IOTUSA on March 21, 2017, 01:31:04 PM

    Whats the hash rate disparity between 8 and 4 GB memory on the 480 cards?

     8 GB RX 470/480 cards almost always have faster RAM (commonly 8000 Mhz effective stuff) than 4GB cards do (commonly 6600 or 7000 Mhz effective).
    I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
    Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
    1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)

  • snakey
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1386
    Merit: 1001



    View Profile
    March 22, 2017, 04:54:03 AM
     #12977
    Quote from: QuintLeo on March 22, 2017, 04:42:28 AM
    For reference, my "big rig" triple R9 290 rig uses a Sempron 145 (single-core) CPU.
    It sees the same hashrate per card on ETH/ZEC as my dual-290 rig that has a A10 7860K quad-core CPU.

     Neither ETH nor ZEC uses a lot of CPU (unless you're running an ETH older miner that generates the DAG file on the CPU, but even there it's interleaving that usage where it doesn't slow you down after the first startup).


     Folding, on the other hand, needs substantial CPU support.



    Thank you for the reply.

  • hashgoalPool
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 177
    Merit: 100



    View Profile
    March 22, 2017, 05:24:35 AM
     #12978
    is there any way to mine with 6 gpus in gigabyte z170x gaming 3 mobo?  5 gpus work fine, but if i attache gpu to 6'th slot then cpu not boot up.

    can anyone have idea?


    thanks

  • omshree
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 270
    Merit: 100


    View Profile
    March 22, 2017, 06:24:56 AM
     #12979
    Quote from: hashgoalPool on March 22, 2017, 05:24:35 AM
    is there any way to mine with 6 gpus in gigabyte z170x gaming 3 mobo?  5 gpus work fine, but if i attache gpu to 6'th slot then cpu not boot up.

    can anyone have idea?


    thanks

    You might need a PCI-E 1X Jumper Wire. That usually does the trick.
    Donate if you like 1ANALSEXXGMd6HaN6CzQXtURLC5H9TjKoo

  • ffthomas
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 160
    Merit: 100


    View Profile
    March 22, 2017, 07:25:33 AM
     #12980
    Quote from: snakey on March 22, 2017, 04:09:48 AM
    Quote from: rpg on March 22, 2017, 03:50:39 AM
    Quote from: snakey on March 22, 2017, 03:40:08 AM
    Hi guys, would appreciate a little help please.

    I remember the early claymore versions were using a lot of cpu power....Just wanted to know if the latest version is using much of the cpu because I want to use a celeron cpu..

    Can anyone please confirm that celeron cpus are ok and if yes which ones are ok for 1150?

    Also is 4gb ram enough?

    Thank you.

    Running 2 mobos one with a 1156 i3 and the other with a 1150 celoron. Both with 4 gigs of memory. On the 1150 uses 5% of CPU with 200 meg pages and 3 gig free phisical memory. All under win7, one home the other pro

    Thanks so much for the info.....So basically the same..

    Does not affect the speed of your GPUs?

    What model celeron please?

    I use Celeron G1840 in my rigs and I use Core i3-4160 only in 1 rig. I didn't experience any difference in mining hashrate. Claymore fixed the CPU-usage problem couple of months ago.

    So you can use the cheapest Celeron for mining, everyone does that. CPU mining is not worth the investment and also the electricity cost, so you never need better CPU than the G1840.
    Pages: « 1 ... 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 [649] 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 ... 759 »
      Print  
Page 648
Viewing Page: 649

IRLBTC™ © 2025 IRLBTC.com