Good old days when you had to use a hexagonal pencil to roll them backwards.

(disclaimer: it was safer then than the automatic rewind...     )    

15 to 2

reduced  to 10 to 2

My wife and I watched a lot.

I wanted more like 25 mill to 1 mill or 25 to 1

but they clearly sided with Depp.

If she appeals he can simply say rather than disgrace the true why me women in the world I will do no contest on the appeal give her the 2 mill and donate 7 mill to the 2 charities she stiffed along with giving 3 mill to real women victims of abuse.

Amber is pretty much dead to the world and should crawl into her hell hole and shut the f up.

fini bitch.

nah, skip the cutting and just graft the 3 on.. ie 329k

Nope upgrading and modding the bot. is okay. Shredding buddy is a no-no.

Nonpartisan Money: Depolarizing Bitcoin


Thanks for passing that along.  The editing by that random crypto-shill Youtube channel is blatantly dishonest.  No one with even the slightest sense of ethics would stitch together clips of words and phrases like that.

The very first result in a non-Google search finds the source:

• “Bitcoin and the American Experiment”, The Heritage Foundation, May 23, 2022.  Featuring Ted Cruz, Michael Saylor, Caitlin Long, and Cynthia Lummis.
• Original video (94 minutes):
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hh-elIu_KPk
  

Better to spread links to the source than to the poorly-edited “please like muh crypto youtube channel” ripoff.

I don’t have time to watch this video (or any video), and I am generally uninterested in U.S. partisan politics.  Too bad, what’s going on there affects Bitcoin; and what I’ve seen in the headlines lately looks worrisome.  Perhaps I may peruse the video later.

---

It’s sad to see this.

There have always been people from the left in Bitcoin.  I don’t recall ever having seen this type of apologizing or defensiveness for linking to their opinions about Bitcoin.

I don’t usually follow this type of stuff.  The apologizing is what caught my attention here.

Bitcoin is the most political form of money ever invented, but it is nonpartisan money with respect to modern partisan politics.  That is one of Bitcoin’s key strengths.  The polarization of Bitcoin would weaken it.

I think that everyone should feel welcome in Bitcoin.

Liberals who care about fairness, equality, and human rights, who want money without institutional biases—money that resists the imposition of structural biases.  I’m not surprised to see people in underprivileged countries reaching out to Bitcoin as a lifeline.

Conservatives who want sound money, fiscal responsibility, and individual freedom.  I’m not surprised to see the Heritage Foundation taking an interest in Bitcoin.

That’s not compromise.  It is a principle, and it is also political savvy.

Bitcoin is like the customary rules of international diplomacy:  It applies to friends and enemies alike, it benefits everyone, and it’s in everyone’s self-interest to accord this benefit to everyone else.

The polarization of Bitcoin could ruin that.