The funny thing about that is, the default graphs only go back to Jan 2021 so they can make their comparison between bitcoin and the US dollar.  Funny how the graph seems to coincide with their point until you zoom out a bit and then...

 

 The graph only goes back to somewhere in 2015 for bitcoin but it seems as though you can afford nearly an infinite number of eggs now with your 2015 bitcoin whereas the volatility of eggs prices in US dollars is unbelievable going from a high of $2.96 to a low of $1.20  and back again in a rollercoaster-like fashion!  How is a homemaker supposed to budget groceries with that sort of volatility?!  Fuck you FRED for the disinformation (which for those of you who don't yet know is  purposeful misinformation).

Bart (squeezed a bit) upside down so quickly? Thats' unusual. What's next? Another Bart?

Bitcoin hasn’t reached mass adoption because it isn’t being used as a medium of exchange. By spending bitcoin, we can demonstrate its usefulness as money.


Source : https://twitter.com/BitcoinNewslet1/status/1534219159806132224?t=j2MkpAh36xmVn6vzikwTXw&s=19

Ooh.  Intrigue.

(a little easier: https://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1ss24a6 )

PPS (For those scared of shady links... This is just a rolled up version of this fellows thread.  I wonder if this is real, and really will expose lots of "crypto" people.  I kind of hope so)

Fuck off with any of those implied assertions that: 1) something is wrong with bitcoin, 2) bitcoin is not sufficiently being adopted (or fast enough), 3) people need to spend their bitcoin in order for bitcoin to  be valuable... 4) if people do not spend their bitcoin, then bitcoin is not going to survive (or have enough utility) 5) we need to do something quickly in regards to being able to spend bitcoin, otherwise the competition is going to eat bitcoin's lunch...

People can do whatever the fuck they want with their bitcoin, and surely there are some disincentives to spend bitcoin anyhow with some of the tax and accounting implications.. and even some of the possible tracking issues (KYC or whatever you want to call it), and if we might sometimes use the expression that normies are going to "get bitcoin" at the price they deserve.. we might also suggest that HODLers are going to choose to shave off some of their corns (aka precious lil) at the time and place of their own choosing... so stop trying to suggest that I have some kind of obligation to spend my corns for the mere sake of it... If you want me to spend some of my corns, then make me an offer for them. What you selling?  Is it worth it to sell corn or might you be taking dollars also?  Is there a price difference?  Do you even know my own situation?  I might not mind spending some of my corns, but if there are options to spend in various ways, then I am going to spend that other less valuable crapola first... if I have any of it...

Of course, on the other hand, if I ONLY have corns, then I don't mind taking an inferior deal in order to get whatever product that you might be offering to part with some or all of my lil precious, but surely I would consider that those who might have put their lil selfies in a position of 100% corn, have put their lil selfies into a pickle in which they do not have very many options, and part of any BTC HODLing strategy should involve figuring out how to manage some of the value allocations of value (which would likely include other kinds of assets and currencies) in order that the bitcoin that is held provides more options rather than fewer options.  In other words, ideally, hodling bitcoin should be putting the HODLer into a position of having more rather than fewer options.

Bart (squeezed a bit) upside down so quickly? Thats' unusual. What's next? Another Bart?