I'm not registering to read the article but the title says it all...

I just don't understand why two grown men with so much money play such twisted con games to achieve even more. Its like, how much is enough? I know you could say the same thing about any modern day robber baron hypercapitalist. Just seems like a bizarre way to spend your time on planet earth.

Anyway I thank their egos for the free entertainment.

It's not a twisted game, this is how the system works, owners of hash get to decide the outcome, they have skin in the game. I think CSW acts like a dick most of the time, but he's 100% correct when it comes to how governance works with PoW, miners vote with their hash.

It would be better if there isn't a fork into 2 coins, this is like a presidential primary, both sides should fight as hard as they can to convince owners of hash to mine using their client on November 15, but once the battle is over the loser should fall in behind the winning side and support them, we're actually all on the same side. A split just destroys the goal of digital scarcity, the hardcap of 21M coins, it strengthens the arguments of the opponents of crypto.

Here's the article archived https://archive.is/7rwQ6 not that it's of much substance.

Hey what's with the pyramid scheme in your signature? Inniative Q?

All the scams making you stupid bro? People get red-tagged for supporting these scams...

Again, folk on this thread have 'tried' to explain this to me before. But I'm still befuddled....so just checking...

IF you have a BTC paper wallet from 2015 with your BTC and of course 1st fork of BCH coin on that wallet from the first BCH fork.

AND you never have touched it. It still has its 'virgin' BTC and 'virgin' BCH sitting their patiently trolling you to blow it on girls and travel

Do you have to move your BCH to an individual wallet BCH for this next BCH fork off of above original BTC 2015 paper wallet address chain to work?

Or will it act like all other forks of above with riginal BTC wallet with BCH on it....and you don't have to do zip...moving the BCH off of the legacy address?

Thus, does my original BTC and BCH wallet address from 2015 above act like the original 1st BCH wallet as well and no move is needed?

Hopefully, this clears up what I'm asking. I assume I can leave all this alone and this next BCH fork will be included in the 'varied attachments of many dubious

forked BTC coins' on this BTC paper wallet from 2015

I'd think this is the case for all those BTC wallets that have yet to move off BCH off them yet from the very first BCH fork. Thus this next BCH fork

will act the same, without any action on my part. Or my 'paranoia' is justified and this next BCH forked coin off of BCH can only fork off a 'pure' BCH address..thus I'd better move off the BCH.

Probably more than 50% of folk never moving their original BCH off their original BTC...that would be a lot less of this BCH forked coin in the world if the fork is off of a generated BCH wallet address only!

Hopefully, what I'm asking makes sense...but use small words and pictures....for clarity...I seem to be getting 'dimmer' with age, dont' ya know. ...not that I'm paranoid..it is just that I'm very, very, paranoid.

(could be worse, I could work for NASA and screw up the technical communications as I did with previous posts on this thread to me on this and everyone dies.eaaaak!..best to grovel and just ask again

thank you for your patience on this

I will labor to be less of an 'idiot' in the future

brad