Cute , guess you lost money.
Don't blame me because you are dim witted.
feel free to fuck off
Bitcoin Cash 24 hour Trading Volume is $3,029,520,000 higher than old 1mb Bitcoin $2,894,220,000 , at the time of this post.
╥Aztek
You say some interesting things.
But for those of us who are not very technical at all, could you or (anyone) kindly do a point by point comparison of the technologies?
On one hand what does BTC have and on the other side what does BCC have.
This would take me forever to do so I would understand if no one has the time.
Or maybe someone either already knows or it has been done and a link can be posted.
Good day.
Heres some info m8, but i would advise ,research more.
http://www.trustnodes.com/2017/07/23/bitcoin-cash-splitting-segwithttps://www.segwetters.org/ 
https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@krabgat/what-is-segwitThe arguments against Segwit are:
The block size increase is not enough to satisfy the growing needs of Bitcoins user base.
Others see a hidden agenda as a large number of people working on SegWit are also employed by a company called Blockstream, whose primary product is side-chain solutions.
Because a side-chains transaction will be verified by a trusted third party it is an unacceptable compromise because this is what the blockchain is supposed to eliminate.
The SegWit is providing solution to the following challenges in the network;
Resolve the weak spot in the Bitcoin software
Increase of the block size limit to an absolute maximum of 4 MB. The actual block size will depend on the network conditions. It is predicted by experts to be in the range of about two to 2.1 megabytes immediately after SegWits activation.
Remove the barrier to the implementation of second-layer solutions (side-chains) like the proposed Lightning Network. Second-layer solutions remove the bulk of the transactions off the blockchain to a side-chain.
(bcc solves these issuses and more)
If Bitcoin Cash gets majority of PoW then it becomes de facto Bitcoin.
