Noobish question- Lets say Segwit and Segwit2x are an overwhelming success and blows away BCC in every way possible. Cant BCC just implement Segwit as well and have 8MB + Segwit to have the upper hand? Yes, I know BCC miners would have to approve it and all, but the majority hash is controlled by a few individuals so it would be easy to do, right?
Segwit2x is destined to fail,
Segwitcoin Core Devs are refusing to support it, so all of the software support will go plain old segwit.
Segwit is not an upper hand it is a trojan horse to trick the stupid into trading LN offchain notes instead of actual bitcoins.
LN=Banking
(at some point they will turn it in to fraction reserve banking)The push for LN & segwit is that it will allow offchain transactions.
Many Exchanges already perform Offchain Transactions that are
instant with any coin on their exchange without the onchain transaction fees.
So why does the cryptoworld need segwit & LN
(Time Locking Coins for fees), well that is the funniest thing of all ,
it does not need them.╥Aztek
Hi Mr Aztek....i share the same view...
I see absolutely no benefit to segwit at all, and not even one person has come forward to tell us , we are wrong and the reasons why we should embrace segwit over bitcoin cash
(tek ...dont reply , you dont count remember lol)
