Seems promising project as it has clear milestone setup for the period.

Sure, this is important for ICO, because everything here is tied up with money so it should be worked out well.

I feel like communism has become more of an excuse to not make some of the more uncomfortable changes rather than legitimate ideology. It's more than apparent their ideology has inherited little from communism. At least it's what it looks like from the outside.

Oops, sorry, edited, try it again, should working now. That is not the best article about it, but simple. If you want more info, try to google and found some thread here

By what criteria do you determine the success of the project?

ICO also does not want to work in the US. For example, Xwin does not work at this territory? Therefore, no, the example with the US is not correct. Yes, China chose a very "heavy-handed" way, first forbidding the ICO, then the stock exchange, but it had a reason for it. There are countries that, on the contrary, treat this with smart direction, like Korea, which does not prohibit, but only seeks new approaches.

There is such a thing as mentality. They have a mentality utilitarian when very difficult have to change or have smth new. Therefore, no matter how it may seem, ideology has very much influenced many decisions, like this.

And what to do with tokens after the end of the ICO? Will it have any value?

Yeah, of course. Not earlier