in my view the right ico means the ico team should be attending more conferences and aiming for development of coins in various social media channels and advisors should be repetitive even small idea can be executed when they work in proper manner
A significant part of the success provides experienced, well-matched team. So it's good if you can find out more about who works in a startup whose tokens you intend to buy. The site should be names, contacts, and brief biographies of at least the key team members. Well, if you have specified that they have taken part in a similar successful projects.
I believe that the ICO should pay attention to the following factors :
1.Description of the project. Try to understand what is its usefulness. The pattern of distribution of tokens. We don't believe in greedy developers, and if the team accumulates more than 30% -40% of tokens is already an occasion to reflect.
2.Business model. How to make money? Why tokens? Roadmap. How long? What are the stages? Team. Who are these people? Jurisdiction (Very important loyal jurisdiction like Switzerland or Singapore)
3.Working with the public. It's certainly not a major factor. If the project does not PR, but you see strong team work - bad PR work is a trifle.
4.Major investors. A large Fund behind them, who believed in the project.
5.Competitors. Does the project have competitors? As you negotiate? What is the liquidity? It is also important to understand what the exchanges will trade a token to estimate its potential liquidity.