I am really regretful invested in this shits ICO. I will never ever invest in any ICO that are German from now on! They started banning people who voice thier concern about the way the project is running. ICO closed on FEB 9 and till date unable to launch and to add insult to injury came up with a rigged voting system to further delay another 2 months! What are fucking joke is this?? Well, now the result is out and they got what they wanted and we the communities will dump the token when it hits the market and continue to bad mouth the project all over the social media. In the end, this coin will fail and joined the 90% of FAILED ICO!! I  can see this is thier future. The communities will win. It awlays does with this kind of ICO.

You are the most idiot dev in ico history, do you know how many member of your telegram group ? It is 48k members idiot, all the investor is there, and 90% vote for option #2, so how come your idiot vote can win option #1 , because your scammer savedroid team cheat on that vote

We did this community voting over the whole savedroid community, where a lot of people are not at bitcointalk or at Telegram. Therefore we've sent an email-newsletter on 11th of May to inform everyone. If we consider the whole community and not single channels the result is that option #1 was favorited, so we stick to that.

Not even a central instance can move them. Transfer is also locked for us. We promised a synchronized start also from the centralized and decentralized exchanges. Unlocking the tokens would actually a real break in the deal.

That is an interesting bit of information, apparently he is still confident to speak in public and also confront the investors in person, I am sure also russians invested in the ICO. Last week was a bbq in the new office and I heard that Dr. Yassin Hankir was also present and overall there was a positive athmosphere and good vibe. The only major complaint was that they served a cheap beer called Oettinger which get at Aldi. On a positive note you could say there are spending the investors money responsibly.

Independent voting results are very different from official info, provided by Savedroid. Personally, I would like to wait a little bit, till they conclude the agreement with big exchange. But if the community decided to sell SVD as soon as possible, their voices should be heard.

I'm wondering why the vote of savedroid does not show how many people voted? Suppose in the vote by an organized savedroid team took part only 100 people. From 100 people 80 voted for number 1, and 20 people for number 2, a ratio of 80% to 20% is obtained, and if we take into account the second poll where the majority supported number 2, then quite different percentages come out. It turns out 772 for number 2 and 91 for number 1. And this is a completely different percentage, already 80% voiting for as soon as possible. Therefore, some kind of non-transparent voting is obtained.

The number of investors is simply too big for them to walk away of this point but It definitely doesn't look good. If we're going with #1 on vote and for some reason, one of these exchanges is not interested in listing SVD, does it mean that the token won't be listed anywhere else?