I actually answered this already in one of my posts here. But most of you are correct. We are an asset-backed token our value is as solid as it can get, as the value of our token asset is woth the millions of dollars worth of Kepler's physical assets.
But how should your asset back your tokens? Your coins will be traded on a free market, so that the price would be determined by supply, demand and what people are willing to pay. How will you make sure that people will not sell lower in a crash or whatever?
I think this is a concern that involves ALL projects stocks etc... each company has the risk to devaluate when a marketcrash happens, it's called risk on investment.
Of course this is a problem which affects every project and every crypto currency, but I dont want to see false promises and if maybe the price is falling a lot of shitstorm because of this promises.
It's a slippery slope for sure. The markets are not always rationale. There are undervalued and overvalued companies.
agreed about the overvalued and undervalued company.. seen some good project fail ico and some shit coins doing well
2018 might be the year that this will have some kind of turnover...some kind of "watchdog" could be set in place to remove the crappy shitty projects.
Crypto projects should be accepted or denied, based on some core elements... (the need of a white paper, a good pro website, good community, good roadmap, clear transparent view on the project, ...)
