I have taken part only in short icos. I am interested in this theme and would be glad if you explain why this happens, i have never thought that the length influences the tokens, what is the connection? Not sure but i will take part in more icos

Yes, the longer you do, the more work you do, but the total bounty is fixed and will not change, so you will get less. Those who take too long to change the rules at will are liar.

Both long term and short term bounties are worth participating in them. Most hunters hate long term bounties because of the longer period they use to make due payment to participants. This even bores most people not to participate massively in such campaigns which leads to a fewer in their earnings.

I think it's the other way around. The longer it is, the bigger rewards you get; however, it's not more gainful, I would say. It's because most projects, they tend to decrease the value of their rewards as they prolong their campaigns. Like for example, some starts at say a certain value per post for bounty signature campaigns, but as the project reaches around two or three months, then tend to cut it to half or even more. The extension is actually a sign that even though they are continuing the project, they are having a hard time reaching for their desired investment quota, which is why, they are forced to cut down the rewards they pay their joiners.

Not always .. First of all, we must look at the project itself, what technology it has, how the team works, how they work on the implementation of the project ... I can say for sure how I participate in the bounty. That all projects are different and are moving in different ways. In one bounty participated more than 6 months and accordingly a good salary was ...

The longer you work, the more work you do, but the total reward does not increase, of course it is a loss. So don't participate in projects that have a long time, too many variables, it is likely to fail in the middle of the problem.

As a rule, this is genuine - the more ICO endures, the less income for individuals from the liberality battle. Be that as it may, this isn't relevant to all cases and not to all positions. The higher the rank of the member in the ICO signature crusade, the more prominent will be his profit hole as the span of the ICO increments. Likewise, some of the time a long haul ICO brings more benefit than a couple of short ones. Everything relies upon the particular ICO venture and its prospects. Along these lines, it is difficult to decide ahead of time to what extent the ICO task will end up being effective.

This is because the team has difficulty reaching softcap or hardcap so that the longer the bounty then the fewer the earnings, and even we should be ready if we do not get anything because the team failed to reach softcap or become a scam.

In my experience participating bounty campaign, a lot of features they they promoted. But as you said that the longest the bounty the fewer the earnings, it depends on the participants. More participants attracted the longest bounty as they know that they earned more rewards but on the other side you've been earn less for more numbers of joining.