well for me it depends in your rank to how higher coins you got but the recent bounty i participated it's not like that.

I think there are too many participants in a bounty so that the number of allocations is small.

you can see at this time one gift has thousands of participants, take the example of social media gift the number of participants can reach 5000 participants. total allocation in for the participants that you can predict how you can get it.

If the company does not have a limit on participants, and the lowest ranks can participate, then the longer the company goes, the more participants there will be and, consequently, the less the payments will be.

Your friend is right, but if almost everyone leaves, and there are few people left, then maybe there will be a good income.

how do you say so? for me, its better to have a longer bounty duration, because I have the chance to gather more stakes than any other participants. and your earnings is being counted for how long you've been in the campaign and tasks completed every week.

Probably project has some difficulties due to ICO postponding. Also it could be sign of project scam but it is not 100%.

same here, its better to become part of projects with 1-2 months duration than taking 3 or more months in the campaign, there is no reason for the project to run that long.

This holds true if the campaign is extended and token allocation is still the same.  Also,  if the number of participants are not limited.  But if there will be an additional token allocation,  then I think you better stay on the campaign.

In normal circumstances, that's the way it is. The total bonus has not changed. The longer the time goes, the more people will participate in the reward activities, and the rewards they can get will be fewer and fewer.

everything is individual and depends on the specific project. there is no definite pattern to consider this fact. so you need to disassemble the pool bounty