It is true because the longer the campaign the more participant will join. It means few bounty will be distributed in each participants. It is also not worth the time and effort and it would be worst if the ICO is a failure.

It depends on the amount of  bounty pool, even if ICO is delayed, and if the supply is sufficient, the income is increasing, especially if many participants earn more and more from the bounty.

It is usually depends on rank. If a Legendary/Hero and Senior members account the longer the bounty the higher the pay however for Full-member and below the longer the bounty the lower the pay will get since high rank members have high stake per week than the lower ones.
For you maybe u just stay than to waste the effort you made for the past months.
[/quote]

This is the best answer. That why ranking is very important when joining bounty campaign Legendary user can earn 5% of Bounty allocation even so many participant. While low rank will get so less when participant is so crowded. Well you shouldnt leave the campaign you started for a month its better than getting none,

I think your friend thinks it's right. This is because long-term campaigns are nothing more than waste of time. When you spend too much time, your winnings will increase or decrease in the same proportion. When you think about details such as the project being below the target price, scam emerging or failing, there are factors that will support your friend's opinion quite strongly.

Well the longer a bounty the more fellow bounty hunters might not continue with it, thus increasing your staking. That's about the only advantage I can think of.

But now there are very few bounty payments weekly. Almost all bounties require you to wait until the ICO is over, and the time for the ICO to end may be unknown.

the longer the bounty and the number of participant will affect the total money to be distribute. but it depends also to the total allocated funds for every bounty that we have. for this days the allocated funds is almost 30-45% every campaigns it is very low compare to other icos.

In this matter, everything is well described by the mathematical term Coefficient of Useful Action. The longer the bounty, the correspondingly less reward per unit time. In a subscription company, the lower the rank, the more significant this gap will be. But in any case, the decision is yours.

It all depends on the number of participants and on your rank.  And it's good bounty or not.

Well it's true. I'm going to tell you why, most of the bounties nowadays are rewarding the participants through stakes which will be varying it will all depends on the number of participants will going to join. For you to easily understand this i'm going to make a situation.

Let's say the project has a 100$ funds that will be allocated to participants and there are 5 participants including you that has a 10 stakes each overall campaign

Participants 1 - 10 Stakes
Participants 2 - 10 Stakes
Participants 3 - 10 Stakes
Participants 4 - 10 Stakes
You               - 10 Stakes
--------------------------------
          Total  =  50 Stakes

So the formula is this: Total funds/Total stakes x individual stakes = Reward

100/50 x Your Stake = 20$ (Your reward)



CONCLUSION: The longer the bounty exist, the more participants will join and if there are more participants will join the more overall stakes therefore the the reward will reduce also.