The devtome.org and devcoin.org domain names are down. I don't know why this happened, I contacted Cablepair but have not received a reply. Fortunately Jasinlee and Gweedo have made a new devtome.com:
http://www.devtome.com/doku.php

I bought up devtome.com and we are setting it up as we speak already.

The problem is that Cablepair has completely abandoned everything. He is not answering emails, or renewing the domain or doing anything at all. That's why Jasinlee bought devtome.com. Once Jasinlee has the wiki up, then we'll just eventually point devcoin.org to the devcoin page on the new wiki.

I officialy request to drop Luke-Jr from the devcoin receiver list cause of hostile activity against sha256 based chains. In my eyes it cant be, that we support this just out of fear of an 51% attack by Luke-Jr. And letting the whole devcoin project be hold hostage by a single developer on our own list.

You have my vote.

DIVIDEND Crazy Day !

more then 5 600 000 DVC payed today in DVB dividends.

By all operating systems, do you mean Linux, Windows and Mac?

I suggest a 2 then 1 share bounty for Mac. A generator that makes a three would get an additional 4 shares.

Edit; the 2 share bounty was awarded:
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/34586.msg1947022#msg1947022

Only the 1 share award remains.

I officialy requested a adjustment of the code of p2pool https://github.com/forrestv/p2pool in a way it would work with Devcoin as mainchain from forrestv.
Im aware of the crypto-economic situation acutaly. So there is no need to argue against it in this terminology.
I request this option, cause this would allow not only devda.ch to run a pure devcoin based p2pool with mm solo mining for all sha256 based alt chains.
Bitcoin block reward is about to become halved, maybe the economic value and hashrate will rise, maybe not, what ever it will do, its just an alt chain from my point of view to Devcoin and the financial value of it shouldnt be the main criteria for evolving this project.
I agree with other devs that we have to show up some difference, for me personaly the capability to vote democraticaly upon development is a huge difference to bitcoin. We should protect and support this!

Any objections ?

I'm glad you understand that you would be throwing away the 90%+ part of the value that bitcoin gives to merge miners. Because of the waste of money I object to this option.

Mining is just a question of making as much value as possible for the miner and any shareholders. Once the money is made, then the profit can be sent as the cooperative wishes to the miner, shareholders, worthy causes, etc..