Evidence is what i am waiting for as well, and alot of others i think
It is too big an investment to do on blind faith for us who cant program an FPGA ourself.

But it is good of the OP to share it if he actualy does it, and probably very profitable for him!

What I don't understand is why the op is not devoutning his efforts to equihash and cryptonightv7. These both has or will boot Asic from the network and they both got late coins support. For all that we know neoscyrpt and ethash has ver efficiency asic on the network that we are not aware of yet.

This.

You have spoke the most sense on this and the other thread and personally I am convinced you are intelligent and know what you are talking about on this subject.  That doesn't mean to say that I have any reason to trust you or those trying to profit here when there is still not even so much as screen shot.   I could be misreading the information presented, but the only thing that I saw was a screenshot of a miner making about a penny per hour and it wasn't clear whether it was an AWS EC2 instance or the hardware photographed.

A couple of people here are dangling carrots to solicit business.  One of them has made statements that you and one other have debunked.  It is reasonable for anyone that is hungry for a carrot to question whether it is real or not.

I understand completely why you would wont to hold onto your competitive advantage.  Especially if it is something that you depend on as your primary form of income.  Personally, I like to think that if I were using open source projects and information derived from a community that I would contribute any information that I had to offer back to that same community but that is easy for me to say while it is not costing me anything to do so.

For me, I am actively seeking to hire an FPGA developer to prove the concept and will release any code commissioned as open source.  Let me know if you're interested 

Not at all angry.  Attempted to make that clear on my last post.

My point here is that some very smart people here are making unproven claims.  It is healthy to question those claims that others here are hoping to profit from.

If you truly do have a skill that has given you a competitive advantage, by all means keep it to yourself, you've earned it.

One point to understand is that some FPGA Devs have fallen out of the closet once the OP started his public discussion. They probably would have liked to stay hidden, and no fault of theirs for that. Its all about money in the end.

Ok, you have me misunderstood again.  I appear to have led you to believe that I'm presenting myself as a white knight, gambler and/or investor.  I am not claiming to be any of those things.  I am a mining hobbyist.  I do not have a significant investment in it and I do ok from my day job in an entirely different field.

Thank you for the tip on the $99 fpga training kit.  I was considering something like this myself and this is actually very useful.  Can you recommend any sources of information on how mining can be achieved on an fpga?

Start with something simple like SHA256D used in Bitcoin:

https://github.com/progranism/Open-Source-FPGA-Bitcoin-Miner

Or something from the official Xilinx marketing publication:

http://issuu.com/xcelljournal/docs/xcell_journal_issue_84/16

Have fun!

Edit: I forgot to include standard explanation about the difference between CPU programming and FPGA programming.

CPUs have von Neumann architecture with linear memory, e.g. from 0 to 4294967296. Compiling and running your first 10 line program will take seconds on your typical usable computer with 4GB of RAM.

FPGA have a completely generic two dimensional architecture that literally has kajilion of constraints. Most of those constraints are secret to the FPGA vendor. The XCVU9P FPGA discussed in this thread has about 2104 pads, just describing the pads that are actually connected with useful signals on the VCU1525 board is a file that has 25 pages in the manual. Those are the constraints that are visible and not secret.

When compiling your first 10 line FPGA program the Xilinx toolchain will still have to process those constraints even if you use less than 1% of 1% of the whole VCU9P chip. On the other hand the small XC7A35T chip on the training board has much, much less internal constraints that needs to be read by the toolchain.

You will observe that your small 10 line FPGA program will be completely compiled and done for a small device like like 7A35T while for the large device the Xilinx toolchain is still decrypting the secret VU9P constraints file. Amazon recommends that you run their FPGA development kit for VCU9P on a computer with 32GB of RAM to get sensible performance for nontrivial programs.

Just be aware of the above.

Edit2: Trying to learn logic design on a high-end device may seriously test your patience. Start with a low-end device.

Edit3: Grammar fixes.