Anybody had a successfull withdraw over the last days ?

lol yeah totally





funny enough that it would kill XMR but not DASH, but yeah i agree, dash has nothing todo with privacy anymore.

Source code?


We will see


Oh protocol governance, interesting... we will see

I'm the one who wrote the press release, and I'd be glad to send you the time-stamped copy of the original Word document if that would help. The phrase: "The Dash team is pleased to announce the release of an iPhone wallet for Dash based on the popular Breadwallet for Bitcoin" has been in the document since I created it. I then posted it on Slack, and the team sent it out. No conspiracy here folks.

I'd like to say that I'm absolutely thrilled to see the trolling here. Do you know why? It's because of what the trolls can't (truthfully) say:

1) They can't say that Dash's transactions are slow. We have InstantX.
2) They can't say that Dash isn't private. The "Darksend is just Coinjoin" argument died last year.
3) They can't say that Dash's development is stalled.
4) They can't say that Dash is centralized (the reference node has been removed).
5) They can't say that Dash has to rely on donations and altruism to grow, because we have decentralized funding built into the protocol
6) They can't say that we have a governance problem, because we have decentralized governance where the entire community votes on what projects to fund
7) They can't say that our blockchain is bloated
They can't say that we don't have enough full nodes or that our node count is shrinking

All they can say is "there was an instamine." True, there was. And you can spend the next ten years arguing over whether or not it was intentional. In the meantime, we'll continue to NOT be any of those eight things above, and probably will NOT be a lot more stuff in the future.

P.S. Someone asked a few pages ago whether Darksend or ring signatures were better. Consider that Darksend is based on mixing (obfuscating) the inputs of your final transaction. Eight rounds of mixing is pretty damn secure. Consider also that ring signatures may be cryptographically secure (although the NSA connection makes me wonder), but that any cryptography, no matter how advanced, is always prone to being unmasked in the future. If ring signatures ever are broken, for instance by a new breakthrough in mathematics, then ever transaction ever made on the Monero blockchain is completely deanonymized and visible to everyone.

No problem

That might be because I happen to have a life outside of this thread - weird though it may may seem - and w.t.f. happened near on 2 years ago isn't exactly the top of my priority list since I bought my coins in markets, and even if it was, it isn't my job to do your research for you.

As it happens I have some recollection of Evan asking the community if they wanted him to relaunch the coin and them going absolutely apeshit and then him apologising for suggesting it.

If I had been around at the time, I'd have gone apeshit as well. There is no Dash or Dash equivalent without its early launch issues.

As I said to someone the other day. A coin with a dodgy launch survived and became successful - for some good reasons.

Live with it.

You sound increasingly desperate, I understand why.

Perhaps you should try to find it yourself, as you will get precisely nothing from me.

Yes... I was there for that vote. And I personally  voted against a relaunch. This is old news and I and many others have answered.  Stop being a lazy troll and read about this in sub forums.  OK... Adam White!