Normally you would get lot of denomination outputs after mixing, so you would just use the required amounts of your 0.1, 1, 10, 100, anonymized DASH, so the change would be no problem.

But in some cases you are right, there could be the case that after the mixing you got for example only 1x10 DASH in your wallet, and want to pay a 4 DASH pizza, so then you would have to mix the 6 DASH change, if you are afraid that your DASH are linked to your identity after the pizza purchase.

BUT for me it was NEVER a problem, i always got enough denominations from 0.1 to 100 to just use complete denomination outputs and not care about a change address.

The voting is really great, and I find the Dashwhale system to be really user friendly too. No need to copy&paste commands in a console any more!
What all masternode owners need to do now is to pick up on the voting, so that each proposal is the result of a majority of the network. Now everyone please start voting

for the ones who are not using any masternode service you can easily get the command to vote from this page:

https://dash-proposals.firebaseapp.com/

click vote and copy the command

The change doesn't go anywhere but to miners. It is called Dead Change.
If you buy your pizza for 9.99 Dash you pay with your 10.0 denomination and the 0.01 change goes to miners but if you don't have any 10.0's (because you used it before) the wallet will use other denoms like 1.0's or 0.1's.
That's the whole point that you mix funds prior to use. Mix them today and use it next year.

Mine was a tiny btc amount stuck in pending forever, alt coins still working as far as I'm aware (Dash v slow?)
The arbritage is a tell sign, it looks like they have plenty of stocks in the olde alt snack section but the cupboard is bare when it comes to the primary food source (did a rat come in through a hole in the back and eat it all?)

There is too much decent competition and can't see them recovering very easily from such negative and extended frell ups.

Whether that's true or not is beside the point since 99% of the population are likeways and it's them who need to be convinced, not me.

What is a problem is cryptocurrency promoters who are wilfully ignorant of how monetary systems operate and you appear to be in that category.

The issues I've cited with opaque blockchains have nothing to do with the their mechanics and everything to do with their auditability by people "with no idea how cryptocurrencies operate" which is why I suggested you revise your sales pitch. Not being able to inspect the balance movements at each end of a transaction is a non-starter for a public, unbacked medium as far as ever getting near the mainstream goes, end of. You won't find much debate over that 'out there'.

You guys really do think that don't you....LOL!!!

Refer to my previous post

 "...It's funny as they seems to think that by spewing here that it might effect investment in DASH.  LOL. Serious well healed investors don't look for their investment insight on nerd fest (troll infested) boards. And any small fry that they may influence with their nonsense we are way better off without because their obviously to lazy to do real research, imo."

Should I actually spend the 5 DASH?  It might be worth it.

Just trawled through many pages of shit fighting Dash vs Monero again. Good grief they really don't let go.

Listen I know about pros and cons of Monero, I know about pros and cons of Dash. I'm here to hear about Dash not Monero. If I want to hear about Monero I'll head off to the Monero thread.
 
Haven't these Monero people got some code to work on or something?

Nice to end on a laugh though, that budget proposal for smooth gets my vote

Unfortunately (well unfortunately for your fallacious argument) no one¹ including Bitcoin (nor Dash, if I'm assuming correctly, and I think i am, that Dash tranasctions work the same way as Bitcoin transactions), has created a cryptocurrency that works the way you suggest.

So your argument that A is better than B because A has some property that it doesn't actually have is clearly false.

Maybe that means that 99% of the population will never support cryptocurrencies, I don't know. That would be consistent with available evidence.

¹ Exception being a few relatively obscure cryptocurrencies such as XCN that actually work on the basis of native balances the integrity of which is maintained by the system. Ethereum does too, although the conditions on movement are arbitrarily complex, thus can't be audited beyond programatic validity anyway.