Trolls = opposing side of the argument/discussion.

I see the "non-trolls" as not wanting to address concerning issues about dash, its developer, and its history.

Questions go un-answered and so they are repeated.

Like the masternode blinding topic Evan has evaded for 8 months now because "MOBILE WALLETS".

Chris Ellis welcome on board.

depends of how you define passive...
You still need to have others on the network who are willing to mix with you (hence the liquidity providers).
This mixing can't be done offline for example. You need to have an active wallet connected to the network.

edit: what if I told you there are coins out there that have a feature you could define with the buzz word "InstantMixSend" :
You instantly mix when you broadcast the transaction. No need for a "dark liquidity pool" in your wallet.

Nope, Bitcointalk.org has gone to the hyenas.  I really don't know why I still come here.  It's a habit to see "what's going on" and I'm usually disappointed

Anyone interested in getting an email when a new budget proposal is released?  I created a notifier to run on your masternode server (or anything with a dashd running)

https://dashtalk.org/threads/december-2015-budget-proposal.7210/page-3

Moocowmoo and dashwhale are welcome to use my code for their products!  

Evan has always been pretty clear that things take time and has had no problem reverting dates/timelines as the project expands. In a world where people are obsessed with everything happening *now*, because they are too used to making a quick buck or hoping for black swan events to push BTC up, this is a relatively sane approach. Bitcoin too, what, 15 years of cypherpunk culture to come together and ya'll want any innovation this second? Why not ignore DASH and just get into whatever cryptocoin still pulls in a fast buck these days (assuming there are even any). The confidence in Evan is expressed in its marketcap. You don't need to reveal the flaws. People can do it themselves and move on if they think he is not up to the task. It's really simple.

I understand things take time in the development world of software. But that doesn't remove the question of why did Evan make it appear that masternode blinding was "fast" and "working" only to delay it because "MOBILE WALLETS" then to never talk about it again as seen in the quotes below:

It could be anything, boredom, a shift in interests, and whatnot. The only thing that matters is whether he delivers in the end. If you invested on the back of darksend and now think it will not happen sell. He's not a CEO.

[Also hello from Litecoin land. I love your coins].

Thanks for reviewing.

It only sends an email when the mnbudget show output is different than it was 1 hour before.  So this would only happen if a proposal was added, removed, or changed.  And then only the change is emailed - not the entire proposal list. 

I suppose the formatting could be cleaned up a bit, but the data that gets emailed is mostly relevant.  Looks like this.
< {
<     "electrum-pt-2" : {
<         "Name" : "electrum-pt-2",
<         "URL" : "https://dashtalk.org/threads/october-2015-budget-proposal.6234/",
<         "Hash" : "244bd3d4a71fa44d76d1299d6d9c45512cd9807f5a1387ca77f13025bf2a8dd6",
<         "FeeHash" : "1c249a6c3b19f86b6b5f2b389da2f00b715e626c63bb3e200026683167cc187e",
<         "BlockStart" : 348936,
<         "BlockEnd" : 373860,
<         "TotalPaymentCount" : 1,
<         "RemainingPaymentCount" : 1,
<         "PaymentAddress" : "XmxCEosWmtgDLS4BpAS8MnwYSEnsyMLbRF",
<         "Ratio" : 0.99832776,
<         "Yeas" : 1132,
<         "Nays" : 2,
<         "Abstains" : 0,
<         "TotalPayment" : 308.65000000,
<         "MonthlyPayment" : 308.65000000,
<         "IsEstablished" : true,
<         "IsValid" : true,
<         "IsValidReason" : "",
<         "fValid" : true
<     },