Anonymised payments are IMO more sensitive than anonymous traffic. So I am all in.

It's brilliant bring it to darkcoin talk

i'm not sure everyone clicked the link at the end in the latest Development Update



These are the details of that link :




Nice job TanteStefana

https://rdns.im/court-official-statement-part-1

Mistake? Will lost in front of the courts and is on probation now.

its a big wide world. not everything is illegal in every country.

Bitcoin will soon be illegal in Russia, while in the UK there is a focal point being planned by the UK Government to encourage Bitcoin and crypto.

Where there is money to be made, there are options that can be found

sent the Devs a message yesterday to think about adding that to the services that Master Node operators can offer.

matching BTC input requests for DRK, with DRK input requests for BTC. you really don't need an exchange at all, where it is legal to offer such a service

Hey there, my friends, I am so glad that things are getting calmer here again. These last days have been so distressful with all the boring trolls and fights. During these days my ignore button helped so much, but still, I have avoided coming here.

But now we have peace again, and that's so good

One awesome thing in these last days was the opportunity everyone had to buy cheap DRKs! I bought as much as I could afford (I wish I could have been able to buy even more) and I am so happy with it.

I'd like, once again, to congratulate Evan, our Dev team, and our community for Darkcoin's achievements.

Now, I would like to know if there are still any Masternode shares services running and accepting new investors. I was participating in vertoe's, and I was very satisfied (vertoe is really great), but unfortunately he had to stop his services, so now I am an orphan of masternode

It's good to be with you guys.

All the best

This is a good point.

The smaller the pool of participants the easier it will be to gain a portion of that pool to potentially compromise DarkTor.

One can assume that there will be a portion of Masternode operators who will not want to operate Tor nodes at all.

Lets assume the rest will. There will be a portion within this group that doesn't want to operate exit nodes.

So essentially a spy agency could purchase just enough to compromise the DarkTor network, specifically exit nodes, without having to even come close to the power necessary to compromise the Masternode network.

This is a valid concern and something that needs to be considered.

ISPs have some obligations on the traffic that they allow through their networks (DarkWallet has been targeted I understand). But ISPs make enforcement based on evidence of illegality and court orders being presented.  

If 99% of DarkTor traffic is legal, then they need to track down those hosting the illegal content. DarkTor nodes are relays like millions of Cisco boxes around the world. No one tries to shut down Cisco boxes.

To run a Tor node they wouldn't have to even purchase anything. Do you all agree "DarkTor" would still be better than standard Tor in that regard?

Btw, how are legit companies like F-Secure able to run VPN services (http://freedome.f-secure.com/en/home.html), why don't SWAT raid their offices?